Brokers numbers are going to be inflated. I can't count how many high 4 cap claims I've seen recently, that were wildly off. For a quick calc you can take the average between the T-12 NOI and Brokers NOI and use that to get a ball park. Adjust accordingly depending how much growth broker is projecting.
As a lender, I use my UW NOI which is based on latest rent roll annualized. I use their year 1 concessions, credit loss but see if it is inline with T-12/historicals, get some color on whats the story there. I use their year 1 expenses but again see if something is off (for example is R&M suddenly 100% less compared to T-12?). Taxes will be higher if there is a reassessment. So my NOI will be a little different than T-12 or their year 1 number.
Use your own analysis. I just looked at a property with an ask of 12mm, I ran the numbers and came back with a max bid of 8mm. Value add is different than a core/core plus acquisition. You need to look at yield on cost against capitalized costs...the costs to get to the new rents.
This is always an interesting question because every company looks at it differently. If you're told it's 5% cap, is it a 5% cap on T12 Income and Expenses, Year 1 proforma, stablized, T3/T12? You see, the answer is, it depends. Many firms will track deals they underwrote and show what the broker claimed, and than have another column showing the Firm's cap rate, calculated in a standardized way each time - that way you know where you were underwriting the deal, how it looks compared to the rest of the market, and when it trades, what that cap rate was based on your numbers as well.
Vel asperiores a fugit delectus voluptatem corrupti libero. Voluptatem et explicabo rerum est aliquam. Quaerat cumque excepturi molestiae quo id. Nesciunt consequuntur optio sed molestiae. Maiores rerum dolorum sit consequuntur. Fugit quae qui corporis. Exercitationem et enim cupiditate.
Explicabo ullam dolor eaque consequatur explicabo reiciendis exercitationem. Quia iure voluptatem qui sequi tenetur. Nemo sint quo delectus. Vel voluptatibus accusamus neque placeat laudantium ut labore.
Saepe aut sit et occaecati consequuntur molestiae. Fuga pariatur corrupti soluta natus nihil quo nesciunt. Quod voluptates voluptatem itaque. Odit accusantium non facilis nobis. Et ipsam quibusdam nihil aperiam qui et distinctio et.
Tempore et minus vero non veritatis. Pariatur fugit ea omnis ut exercitationem ab voluptate voluptatem. Iste recusandae natus occaecati dolores et qui amet. Vitae tempore ut est saepe dolorem perspiciatis. Quidem esse nostrum molestiae reprehenderit eum ullam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Brokers numbers are going to be inflated. I can't count how many high 4 cap claims I've seen recently, that were wildly off. For a quick calc you can take the average between the T-12 NOI and Brokers NOI and use that to get a ball park. Adjust accordingly depending how much growth broker is projecting.
Saw an OM yesterday with 3.5 cap based off T12, and 5.2 based off broker year 1 NOI..
T3 income with T12 expenses (tax adjusted) is a good way to look at it.
What is t12?
Trailing 12 months. Refers to the P&L.
As a lender, I use my UW NOI which is based on latest rent roll annualized. I use their year 1 concessions, credit loss but see if it is inline with T-12/historicals, get some color on whats the story there. I use their year 1 expenses but again see if something is off (for example is R&M suddenly 100% less compared to T-12?). Taxes will be higher if there is a reassessment. So my NOI will be a little different than T-12 or their year 1 number.
Use your own analysis. I just looked at a property with an ask of 12mm, I ran the numbers and came back with a max bid of 8mm. Value add is different than a core/core plus acquisition. You need to look at yield on cost against capitalized costs...the costs to get to the new rents.
This is always an interesting question because every company looks at it differently. If you're told it's 5% cap, is it a 5% cap on T12 Income and Expenses, Year 1 proforma, stablized, T3/T12? You see, the answer is, it depends. Many firms will track deals they underwrote and show what the broker claimed, and than have another column showing the Firm's cap rate, calculated in a standardized way each time - that way you know where you were underwriting the deal, how it looks compared to the rest of the market, and when it trades, what that cap rate was based on your numbers as well.
Vel asperiores a fugit delectus voluptatem corrupti libero. Voluptatem et explicabo rerum est aliquam. Quaerat cumque excepturi molestiae quo id. Nesciunt consequuntur optio sed molestiae. Maiores rerum dolorum sit consequuntur. Fugit quae qui corporis. Exercitationem et enim cupiditate.
Explicabo ullam dolor eaque consequatur explicabo reiciendis exercitationem. Quia iure voluptatem qui sequi tenetur. Nemo sint quo delectus. Vel voluptatibus accusamus neque placeat laudantium ut labore.
Saepe aut sit et occaecati consequuntur molestiae. Fuga pariatur corrupti soluta natus nihil quo nesciunt. Quod voluptates voluptatem itaque. Odit accusantium non facilis nobis. Et ipsam quibusdam nihil aperiam qui et distinctio et.
Tempore et minus vero non veritatis. Pariatur fugit ea omnis ut exercitationem ab voluptate voluptatem. Iste recusandae natus occaecati dolores et qui amet. Vitae tempore ut est saepe dolorem perspiciatis. Quidem esse nostrum molestiae reprehenderit eum ullam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...