For those more familiar with the California housing market, and developers/residential investors in general, what are your guys' thoughts on the state going after cities that don't commit increasing housing stock? More specifically, do you think this method is appropriate, or would something else work better?
Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +46 | Being a 100% Disabled Military Vet Pays as Much as RE Analyst Seat | 41 | 5d |
| +28 | Is anybody just going to leave the industry? | 8 | 6h |
| +22 | Rate Hikes | 14 | 2d |
| +17 | ~$1M saved/invested at age 27 | 12 | 5h |
| +15 | Brookfield vs. TPG Angelo Gordon (in LA) | 0 | 5h |
| +12 | Launching a Development Platform in Greece | 2 | 1d |
| +9 | REPE Analyst Firm Advice | 3 | 3d |
| +8 | Hard Money Lenders? | 1 | 2d |
| +7 | Q3/Q4 CRE Job Market Optimism (or lack thereof) | 1 | 31m |
| +3 | LIHTC Syndicator Comp | 1 | 6d |
Career Resources
Tenetur est magnam eveniet omnis. Praesentium ut quaerat mollitia aut. Fuga officiis rerum vel sint est rem voluptas. Aut reprehenderit inventore nisi et aut rerum.
Est praesentium repudiandae vel. Dignissimos quasi labore neque cupiditate sed et quos vel. Nemo nam suscipit deleniti nihil quae. Facilis totam sit quo natus ut maiores laborum temporibus. Qui consequatur nam cumque itaque. Explicabo quis cum excepturi atque minima id. Eum tenetur tempore est laboriosam natus voluptatem.
Minus provident architecto atque mollitia dolores ut voluptates iusto. Incidunt ullam voluptatem voluptates.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...