So I just read that Biden wants to start taxing carried interest at ordinary income rates. As someone that just reached the holy grail of carry, I'm punching air because it sounds like bs, but tbh have no idea what it means. Was it previously only taxed upon realization whereas now he wants to mark it to market and tax you on those gains annually? Won't we just find a way to value our carry at minimal amounts until it is actually realized if he does go through with this?
Can some senior monkeys with experience / actual carry shed some light on this?
freecarry
Could be wrong but I believe carry was previously taxed as long term capital gains. So 20%. Now it would be taxed the same as ordinary income or short term capital gains (45%+ if you're making 400k+)
edit: a quick google search confirms this
probably get shat on here but this is a good policy change
It is a good thing if you are not compensated with carried interest and a bad thing if you are compensated with carried interest... similar to every other type of special tax on the rich
Yeah I'm pretty neutral on the actual effect of the policy other than being pissed that it affects me. It's similar to the 1031 exchange elimination, people who use it will be pissed, people who don't won't care.
It's currently taxed as capital gains, whereas the proposed plan would treat it as ordinary income. A proposal like this comes up basically every year, so I'm not sure of the political likelihood of it actually passing.
Another part of his plan would increase the cap gains rate, which is effectively doing the same thing. My guess is the carried interest loophole remains, but cap gains tax does increase (though not as high as Biden's initial draft is suggesting).
Sounds like some vestigial occupy wall st party platform rhetoric. Will changing this materially impact the nation's budget deficit? Methinks not. Does it make Pelosi/KH/Biden look like they are taking on the rich. Very much yes.
This is dumb for several reasons. Carry is not ordinary income, payout occurs after taking on risk and creating value with no basis to offset the gain, which if I am not mistaken is why the CG rate was recommended in the first place. Secondly, their approach to monetary policy does not even care if there is a deficit or not, they will print to plug, so why go after higher taxes?
Disclaimer: I fully intend to take advantage of the loophole
To be fair their proposal also makes capital gains tax rate (for high earners) basically equivalent to ordinary income anyways.
If we started from scratch and carry interest was treated as ordinary income, nobody would bat an eye.
The problem is they were giving out free kool aid for the rich and now they are trying to take away the punch bowl.
I'm fine with it.
You could make that argument for literally all taxes on the rich
Yes
Yeah, I agree. Is paying high taxes really enjoying the kool aid bowl?
Analyst 3+ notes that "they were giving out free kool aid for the rich"....no they certainly were not GIVING it in this case. They were just TAKING less of it.
If you’re a vp earning carry are you getting it on your w-2 like ordinary income? Or do you actually get given a piece of the GP vehicle that you own? Or what?
I believe it’s K1 income
Interesting so you’re actually granted part of a partnership? I feel like my fund just does it thru w2 which kind of sucks
The annoying thing is this doesn’t hurt the partners with 100m+ net worth. Or the mega funds.
It hurts the VP or director at a startup fund who is taking $150k base and primarily getting paid in carry. That $500k in pre-tax carry is now $280k instead of $400k. Thats a meaningful pay cut. While previously it might have been worth it to work for an entrepreneurial firm and take a career risk in exchange for carry / upside, you’re now better off taking the safe base + bonus path at a LifeCo or asset manager. So that entrepreneur who started his own fund is now going to have a hard time finding employees to take that risk with him.
As always it’s the upper middle class and small / medium sized businesses who gets fucked. Starwood will be fine, senior partners who have already made their tens of millions will be fine. It’s young, aspirational employees and businesses who get screwed.
Very true. But you may see an adjustment where in future Funds, the Partners give up more of the carry pool to 'make the employees whole on a post tax basis' so that they can continue to compete for talent. This may happen, it may not. It'll be interesting to see where the market goes. But if all of a sudden you see a push for base+bonus ordinary W2 income, you may see a shift where a larger portion of the carry pool becomes part of compensation so that firms don't need to adjust salary and therefore current cash outlay.
Additionally, it's a push and pull and not as simple. There will still be greater upside, or at least greater perceived upside, from getting carry than straight w2 compensation. From my understanding of the current market place, the PE Fund employees make the same (if not slightly more) cash compensation as the Life Co Employees, but the PE employees get a portion of the carry pool which is the kicker. The Life Co employees will also get long term incentives (with a slightly different structure and it's technically not carry - it's more like a phantom carry, but pays out similar to carry after vesting). The difference is, on the whole, Life Co Employees are just paid less (W2 income base + bonus and long term incentives) as the Life Co market for salaries is technically lower.
This only makes sense if you assume the world ends tomorrow.
As with everything else in life, businesses will adjust. Either they'll pay more or give more carry. That simple.
I think thats life in general, really. Poor people don't really have much of any resources to be taken from them and the truly wealthy have the resources to shuffle shit around to minimize their exposure, and simply bend the tax code when they need that to happen. The guys in the middle (or upper end of the middle) are the only ones with enough resources to be asked to pay for something but without the resources to effectively combat that increase. The AMT was a pretty good example of this...minor millionaires subsidizing a tax break for mega millionaires.
Tough to feel bad about carried interest when 50% of the country pays effectively 5% at most in federal income tax.
If you can argue for "taxation without representation", then you can argue for no representation without taxation.
This is confusing, what are you trying to say?
I think he's trying to say that people who don't pay taxes don't deserve to have their opinions communicated to the government
Carry used be cap gains. Now will be ordinary income. Doesn't matter though because cap gains is going to be ordinary income in general (few exceptions TBD in senate). Part of it is a talking point, part of it makes sense.
In his proposal, Capital gains rate will still be 20% if you annual income is under a million in annual income.
The big point missed here is home sales are cap gains for regular americans.
it's total income >1 mil and you get lumped into the new rule. Gains from sale of a home will be included in that sum. It's basically fucking over top ~5% of Americans. Makes sense. They have the least political sway and no one feels sorry for them.
Taxes go up and down. Maybe Buffett said when he started out the corporate tax rate was maybe over 50%. The people who are not able to afford paying more in taxes will hopefully find a way to restructure their taxable income so they can pay all the taxes they owe
Yeah but the effective rate has remained the same.
Quidem et delectus iure aut laboriosam necessitatibus. Sequi quas quia expedita odit. Et quas natus molestiae ut consequatur quidem. Deserunt delectus quis recusandae maxime voluptates et et.
Molestiae et corrupti provident quo sunt ullam qui. Dolores velit reiciendis quasi quo et rerum quidem. Quidem ipsam labore consequatur itaque. Voluptatem eos dolores eaque praesentium ullam asperiores repellendus. Est iure voluptatem et voluptatem illo. Molestias eius vel quis hic alias. Molestiae quia nesciunt in in excepturi earum ea. Deleniti est vel ex ratione sequi a et.
Dolore ut possimus facere iusto molestiae eius. Ea porro dolorem ut. Ipsum iste rem et vero ut. Consequatur commodi in ut nobis ratione. Soluta nostrum provident aut ducimus aut quia.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Mollitia corrupti dolor sunt et suscipit ut. Nihil et fuga non veritatis ut omnis debitis et. Et numquam velit rerum id iure molestias nostrum. Ut cum eum asperiores dolore.
Cupiditate ea facere asperiores sint eligendi eum. Labore facere esse dolorum. Aliquid omnis nostrum commodi et aut et. Aspernatur molestias corporis facere ut. Voluptatibus error et quia qui quaerat molestias et.
Aut voluptatem aspernatur dicta voluptates id. Qui non quia nemo magni quia. Perferendis deleniti ad eligendi in sapiente. Enim debitis temporibus expedita ut aut in nihil. Saepe itaque doloremque sed tenetur. Totam et cum nulla rerum quaerat dolor.