8 Comments
 

There are vast differences between the two. CMBS deal structures and guidelines are constantly changing, if ever so slightly, based on how the appetite for the previous securitizations were subscribed. From 2010-2011 leverage and coverage started to become more aggressive. Remember also that for the most part BS lenders are going up against the Life Co's on the Class A assets ( 500 MM) rather than CMBS shops. In terms of leverage you will be able to garner a higher LTV from CMBS than BS.

 

so it's fair to say I would be seeing a lot more interesting deals in CMBS lending than BS lending when not just seeing Class A, low vacancy, credit tenants asset.

 
Best Response

CMBS shops only do non-recourse and essentially, at least today, 5 and 10 year deals on stabilized properties. They are intensely more disciplined on pricing by the capital markets.

Portfolio lenders can do everything, including assets that qualify for CMBS execution. They can be less disciplined and win the business they want because they don't have to mark their loans. Often times, they are more focused on relationships. BS lenders also do construction lending and bridge debt. The securitized market used to be able to do bridge loans but CDO's are, well, over.

The real answer to your question is CMBS has a clearly defined bucket on what it will do - you can print off the UW standards from a rating agency - and balance sheet lenders don't. This may make you think that balance sheet lenders can be creative and do more interesting things if they aren't pinned down by the fickleness of the market. Not true. Primarily because the CMBS pays more and top talent goes there, but also structurally in a large bank if you were doing balance sheet lending you would be in the "hotel construction group" or the "regional shopping malls group" with an even narrower bucket than CMBS.

 
SFRECMBS is alot more competitive. Im hearing CMBS quotes at 3.15% for 100m mall deals (okay i saw this one).. Crazy!
How the hell would the conduits make any money off that? That's insane - kinda worries me, actually.
 

Harum aliquam vel deserunt minus amet sed. Illum libero voluptates fuga voluptates totam aut non. Sit rerum officia aut enim explicabo ad. Dignissimos enim deleniti quas quia et. Et labore et aut fugiat mollitia dolorem nihil laborum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”