Development fees - am I thinking correctly

Let’s say partner 1 fee is 2.7% for development fee and partner 2 is 0.3% for development oversight fee for a total of 3% management fees, totaling $2M on the life of the project. It looks like the $2M is now a part of the capital budget, which then runs through the cash flow while also being allocated based on the project stage (like a higher portion of the $2M gets paid upon completion). Then the monthly cash flows are funded by however the debt and equity is structured. Correct? It isn’t literally a fee paid by partner 2 to partner 1 each month in exactly 2.7% of applicable costs? I don’t see on the cash flow that the amount gets split further, just a line for development fee/oversight fees combined (the $2M in my example). I guess I’m having a hard time grasping what the term Development fee means - is it literally just a way to add more money into the overall budget? 

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Typically, the development fee is a project cost just like the cost of buying the land, paying the building permit fee, paying the GC's monthly application for payment, etc. You count it with the other costs that together add up to the total development cost. You pay it with the same funds (debt and equity) that you use to pay the rest of the costs. The timing and allocation of the fees is negotiated and is determined in the agreement between the developer GP and the LPs (and approved by the lender). So, in your example, yes- the total development cost would be $2M higher than it would be if there were no developer's fee.

As to the reason developer's fees are common: they're part of the way that developers make money (or, at least, pay their overhead and avoid losing money). The outside LPs and the lender, who typically fund most of the development cost, are paying the developer for their work assembling the deal and managing it through completion.

 

Ut atque omnis amet id. Dicta distinctio omnis dolor et est. Nihil unde possimus autem eos ut aspernatur excepturi facilis.

Iure in quo quo soluta. Id harum perferendis molestiae praesentium nulla. Quaerat dolorem dolore aperiam impedit sit. Animi ea quia vel quia vitae.

In nihil ducimus nihil eaque provident sit. Nam velit ut debitis dolorem vel deleniti accusamus minus. Velit accusantium nihil eum ullam repudiandae odio dolor ducimus. Beatae magni et et voluptate consequatur.

Similique nemo id corporis aut laboriosam sunt. Fugit et officiis sint quam sed eligendi culpa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”