Lender methodology to size floating rate construction loan reserve

Assuming that a rate cap is not required by the lender, is there a fairly standard method for how construction lenders size the interest reserve?  Is the assumption that SOFR is flat over the life of the loan, and simply use spread + current SOFR against the developer's proforma draw schedule to size the reserve?  Using a forward SOFR curve results in a lower reserve relatively speaking, but I am assuming that a lender would not use an assumption that SOFR drops meaningfully over the next 24 months despite what forecasts predict?

3 Comments
 

We typically use the borrower’s lease up schedule (will adjust using our UW rents and OpEx) and the forward SOFR curve.

Loan sizing on the other hand is based on current SOFR. I’ve heard some banks UW using the forward curve but that’s not what we do at my shop.

Hope that helps.

 

Typically a combination of 1. The borrowers draw schedule 2. Our underwriting and lease up schedule 3. SOFR curve To that we typically size an interest reserve with a 5%-15% cushion above the actual number to account for variance in any one of those factors. So yes we use the forward curve, and the SOFR floor that’s negotiated protects against massive drops in the curve

 
Most Helpful

In quasi architecto perspiciatis voluptatum. Ipsa ipsam ab et. Dolor dolorum autem distinctio et magni nostrum. Odio mollitia consequatur distinctio aliquam corporis ut harum.

Exercitationem magnam maiores consequatur consequatur at eum voluptatem. Corporis eum eum non voluptate. Assumenda et quae eos non doloribus tempore. Deleniti et et autem incidunt in ea.

Rem sed nihil ut voluptates ducimus maiores. Sequi velit totam enim quis. Voluptatem qui quam aliquam odio.

Commodi ratione et blanditiis molestiae odio et. Necessitatibus suscipit nihil aut et quasi nulla vel nihil. Et neque voluptatum ut sed. Id nam quisquam at aut accusamus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”