Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +48 | Anyone else being pushed to underwrite more aggressively (Multifamily)? | 14 | 4d |
| +30 | Uncertain of what To Do Next | 5 | 1d |
| +29 | What should we be buying? | 22 | 2h |
| +28 | Capital Restricted Developer | 2 | 1d |
| +27 | Basis play / value-add office in high-growth markets - value trap or generational buy? | 10 | 3d |
| +22 | Warning: J. Shaw Recruiters | 5 | 1d |
| +18 | Due Diligence - ALTA Survey | 3 | 2d |
| +17 | Laughable Job Posting | 3 | 17h |
| +15 | Seeking Advice: How Do You Get Value from ULI Membership? | 2 | 4d |
| +11 | PGIM Real Estate Equity vs. Private Credit | 3 | 4d |
Career Resources
It can be done. It’s called a side letter. It is highly recommended that side letters are disclosed to all LPs, but I don’t believe there is a legal requirement.
Whats the overall feeling on this?
I understand no one likes to pay fees but I also feel that the ethical method would be everyone paying the same fees regardless of investment level.
Not sure if legally each has to know what the other is getting. However, there is almost always an "operating agreement" for the LLC...herein it will detail each partner, and the distributions they receive..
But as mentioned before, yes it can be done. I've seen a few deals do this -- whether it's friends and family money, or just two separate equity partners with different investment requirements.
Not sure how common it is in the industry, but common at my firm through side letters during the subscription process. We're not required to disclose details to other investors.
Examples would be better promotes for larger lead investors or reduced fees, etc.
Nothing unethical about it to me but only if the increased promote comes out of the GP promote after other LPs hit their hurdles, otherwise you'd kind of be robbing Peter to pay Paul in my mind. If you have 3-5 investors willing to put in 70% of the capital, why shouldn't they be compensated? From fund management perspective, it's much more enjoyable to deal with 20 investors than 200 investors. It's just up to how desperate GPs are for the funds. The other smaller investors were willing to accept risk with lower hurdles, and maybe in their portfolio they reduced risk by only putting up $1M for a 10% IRR, while the LP who put in $25M needs a 15% IRR to say yes to your fund.
Natus ducimus necessitatibus sit totam nihil rerum. Odio veritatis aut itaque corrupti nobis. Animi fugit incidunt rerum ducimus. Est sapiente rerum eligendi eum ea sint laboriosam.
Quam hic autem perspiciatis voluptas. Ad aperiam eos qui reprehenderit occaecati et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...