Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
August 31, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Bump. Looked up information on this before and couldn’t find anything substantial.
Unfortunately the biggest aggregator of such data (Preqin) has only been around for one cycle as they were founded post-dotcom bubble (2003).
Kind the main issue of real estate data analytics in general, especially outside the US.
Unfortunately yea, it's amazing how prior to 2008 information in real estate was so asymmetric
Just say no to industry corporate slang
Alright - uncalled capital commitments & subscription lines.
Not over cycles, but green street recently came out with a short piece on how there actually isn’t as much dry powder as everyone thinks
Link?
Not to be a nit-picky asshole, but how the fuck does a reputable firm write something like that? Isn't as much dry powder as who thinks? As I do? As you? Are they setting some arbitrary number as what the common consensus on uncommitted capital is, just so they can write something to undermine it? It's just such a stupid piece. Especially when you consider just how little knowledge they have; if you equate "dry powder" with "uncommitted capital" then there is effectively an infinite amount, because for the right deals, people will always find the money.
I don’t know man take it up with them
barrier standing $5.7B tall, when in reality it measures, say, just $1.4B
They quantify it in the article.
Read more at: https://www.bisnow.com/london/news/capital-markets/forget-what-you-hear…
Was trying to find this as well. I'm curious to see the data they are using. I know plenty of firms begging for deals at 50% LTV or less.
How the fuck did I get ms over this? I just said green street put out a piece holy shit
I wouldn't worry too much about bananas and monkey shit. I just checked - I have apparently been given ms 591 times.
Here's the link to Bisnow: https://www.bisnow.com/london/news/capital-markets/forget-what-you-hear…
And I lol'd at the MS you got
I didn't throw it, but if you're posting something here, you are implicitly standing behind the point being made unless you explicitly say otherwise. Maybe someone didn't like the point you were supporting? IDK
Sint eos molestiae consequuntur accusantium. Alias voluptatem laudantium doloremque eius quia provident quo. Soluta quam sint sit doloremque et autem.
Non rerum laboriosam omnis non. Error doloribus nihil consequuntur sed.
Cumque assumenda nemo quas eius quasi sint et. Vitae voluptatibus esse quo id. Cupiditate ut reprehenderit inventore dicta accusamus. Deserunt ipsam non culpa impedit consectetur. Consequatur perferendis ea dolores.
Vel sit voluptatem occaecati id quaerat voluptatem. Et sed accusamus et nemo.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...