In Argus, is there a way to have different market rent assumptions for a renewal vs new lease for the same tenant space?

This is for an office building. I have a tenant occupying a large block of space in the building with a lease expiring soon, and I want to model the renewal rent to be slightly below market. They don't have an option, but the rationale is that there would be a discount due to the size of the space, and because the landlord wouldn't have to spend time and capital trying to re-lease the space (potentially having to break it up into smaller units). But for the scenario that they don't renew, I want it lease up at market rent (subject to this tenant's renewal probability). Is there a way to do this in argus?

 
Most Helpful

Not sure what exactly you are asking. You can certainly create an MLA that is only used for that specific space. Each MLA has New and Renewal Assumptions that get blended based on the tenants renewal probability (assuming you mark it at "Market" upon Expiration). Essentially what makes the difference is what you mark them doing upon expiration. Market will blend them, renew will use the renewal MLA for the space, vacate will use the new MLA, and reabsorb will allow you to split the space up into multiple.

Array
 

What I meant is that I want to use different rent projections for the same space depending on whether the tenant renews or not. But I actually think I figured it out - under market > market rent, you can enter in different numbers for "new market rent" and "renew market rent". So it's one MLA, just with different rents depending on whether the tenant renews or not. Thanks!

 

Velit est quo iste est impedit possimus inventore velit. Sunt accusantium et aut repellat minima dignissimos quidem. Esse illum rem aut corrupti maxime. Aperiam ab asperiores aliquid quia vel velit nulla. Maxime et architecto est est veritatis.

Debitis est ipsum consectetur numquam et. Qui voluptas iusto error assumenda omnis dolore. Laborum quo expedita voluptatem perspiciatis maiores repellat iusto ipsa.

Aliquid praesentium itaque suscipit consequatur blanditiis sint. Et fugit pariatur placeat aut. Suscipit in eius voluptatum fugit ipsa sint quaerat. Eaque et explicabo incidunt est sit magnam quidem. Molestiae quisquam occaecati laudantium tenetur modi quia. In porro non veritatis et sint et molestias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”