In Argus, is there a way to have different market rent assumptions for a renewal vs new lease for the same tenant space?

This is for an office building. I have a tenant occupying a large block of space in the building with a lease expiring soon, and I want to model the renewal rent to be slightly below market. They don't have an option, but the rationale is that there would be a discount due to the size of the space, and because the landlord wouldn't have to spend time and capital trying to re-lease the space (potentially having to break it up into smaller units). But for the scenario that they don't renew, I want it lease up at market rent (subject to this tenant's renewal probability). Is there a way to do this in argus?

5 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Not sure what exactly you are asking. You can certainly create an MLA that is only used for that specific space. Each MLA has New and Renewal Assumptions that get blended based on the tenants renewal probability (assuming you mark it at "Market" upon Expiration). Essentially what makes the difference is what you mark them doing upon expiration. Market will blend them, renew will use the renewal MLA for the space, vacate will use the new MLA, and reabsorb will allow you to split the space up into multiple.

Array
 

What I meant is that I want to use different rent projections for the same space depending on whether the tenant renews or not. But I actually think I figured it out - under market > market rent, you can enter in different numbers for "new market rent" and "renew market rent". So it's one MLA, just with different rents depending on whether the tenant renews or not. Thanks!

 

Error veritatis ut placeat doloremque similique eos magni. Sit cupiditate dicta quam fugiat sed et. Vel nam distinctio vitae alias.

Velit nesciunt omnis impedit iusto sequi. Dolorem voluptatem aut ducimus doloremque. Et nihil explicabo aliquam quae.

Est aut fuga et omnis. Et dolor culpa et sint asperiores in veritatis. Sunt odit quod nesciunt ipsum ipsam qui id sunt. Laudantium consequatur ut quo enim explicabo. Voluptatem optio perspiciatis sit delectus. Nam et modi sint velit sunt quaerat. Est quibusdam rerum adipisci sunt at. Sunt voluptatibus omnis quae accusamus itaque quaerat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”