Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +43 | What Is Your Backup Plan? | 20 | 10h |
| +39 | Where are free agents signing? | 21 | 16h |
| +35 | AvalonBay Equity Residential Merger discussion | 16 | 14h |
| +34 | Future of Real Estate | 9 | 19h |
| +31 | Laughable Job Posting | 12 | 12h |
| +16 | Extremely Slow Ramp Up | 1 | 1d |
| +14 | In RE, what is the ONE software tool you couldn’t survive without? | 5 | 1d |
| +10 | Dynex | 5 | 1d |
| +9 | Portfolio Management strategy/transaction exposure on the analyst/associate level? | 1 | 1d |
| +9 | Development Budget: use RENTABLE or GROSS BUILDABLE sf? | 3 | 3d |
Career Resources
No. They're all good overall but certainly have differences (ie. KKR is leaner in RE, BX a tad more diverse, SW sweatier, CG based mostly in DC and easier to get into).
Could you elaborate on Starwood?
Never worked there personally but from friends who have I've hear some mixed reviews about culture, whereas the others I've only heard about long hours no other issues on culture. Still a great firm, but have heard some ppl refer to it as "sweaty" and a bit difficult to move-up at times in certain offices.
Culture definitively matters no matter where you work. You could be at an amazing firm with a horiffic culture where you get screamed at each day - well that would suck. Alternatively, you could be at another firm where the hours are atrocious, but you really like the people and work environment.
Non libero et voluptas nulla earum reprehenderit iure. Qui laudantium tempore minima repellendus distinctio accusantium.
Mollitia ea saepe et at. Sapiente eos provident eveniet est culpa atque cum. Dolores ut qui ut eos doloribus mollitia alias.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...