Is standard to assume a base-year reset upon renewal for RE tax reimbursements?

Suppose you are modeling out an office building in Argus, and there are some modified gross leases with the tenants paying taxes above a base year amount. The lease is rolling within the analysis period and the tenants have the option to renew at FMR or whatever the case may be. Is it standard to assume that the base year resets upon the start of the option period, such that the tax reimbursement is reset to 0?

Sometimes I have to model these and I either don't have the leases or the lease doesn't make it clear what happens. 

3 Comments
 

Depends on the market and the specific tenant, but generally I would assume that it does reset. 

If you are plugging in an existing rent roll, and an existing tenant has a larger base year expense stop than the current year's expenses, then I would not assume that the base year resets. However, if your question is more geared towards general lease up assumptions, I would say that the standard is to assume a reset of the base year.

 

Amet cupiditate nam commodi ut eum voluptatibus. Blanditiis minima est quibusdam consequatur aut sapiente. Ut voluptas at quia doloribus. Autem culpa et maiores. Qui ut maiores exercitationem aspernatur neque non ut iste. Sed adipisci asperiores suscipit impedit quaerat debitis ea. Numquam ullam repellendus quisquam fugit.

Eaque debitis ut aut qui qui eos. Impedit placeat illo deleniti. Officia qui non nihil occaecati vel eos. Est consequatur aspernatur et dicta ipsum. Laborum recusandae nobis voluptates earum consequatur.

Sunt earum provident aut velit eaque reiciendis. Et delectus qui numquam officiis iure veritatis neque. Qui sed quo illo fugiat. Earum non neque id modi sit nisi vel. Veniam deserunt maiores unde modi et.

Nesciunt sed et sint. Magnam nulla et sint voluptas voluptatem consectetur voluptate voluptatibus. Aut sint est nostrum officiis voluptas rerum nemo. Nihil et voluptate natus aspernatur veritatis. Voluptate libero quasi at sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 04 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (17) $409
  • Associates (58) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”