Ah, the mysteries of the underwriting spreadsheets! Based on the most helpful WSO content, it's common for different DUS (Designated Underwriting and Servicing) lenders to have variations in their FNMA (Fannie Mae) underwriting models. While there may be a standard set of criteria that all DUS shops must adhere to when underwriting loans for Fannie Mae, each shop might have its own proprietary model that includes unique adjustments or assumptions.

Here's a bit more detail for you:

  • Standardization: Fannie Mae provides guidelines and criteria for underwriting, which creates a level of standardization across different DUS shops.

  • Customization: Despite the standard guidelines, each DUS shop may customize its model to reflect its own risk appetite, market focus, or operational style.

  • Proprietary Elements: Some shops might include additional metrics or have a different interface, making their model unique compared to others.

As a new analyst, you'll find that while the core elements of underwriting might be similar, the devil is in the details, and those details can vary from one shop to another. It's like having a recipe for chocolate chip cookies – everyone starts with the same basic ingredients, but some bakers add a pinch of salt or a dash of vanilla, making each batch deliciously unique!

Sources: FHA/FNMA/FHLMC Underwriter, If 100 of us built a model, would any two be the same?, How do top credit shops compare to MM/LMM buyout?, Are the people at Ducera/Moelis/sweatshops beta males?, Transfer from UVA (Pre-commerce + Echols) to GTown, Vandy, ND (Econ), Brown, WashU (Olin), Cornell (Econ), Chicago or stay?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

It'll differ slightly shop by shop as Fannie is going to try pushing the Lenders towards using their DMS to Gateway as a AI connection. So theoretically all will have the same fields. Most DCU and CU's come from a range of shops with 5-10 year stints at each one so they all have taken the UW's with them so I'd say there is variation but doubt it is significant. 

 

Quidem animi dicta est consequatur. Veniam alias est doloribus est. Fugit consequatur saepe minus dicta ex consequuntur accusamus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”