7 Comments
 

This is always a tough one. To me, there is the endless argument of modelling what you think will actually happen, and modeling what a buyer will model. I can't tell you how many times I've done in-depth market analysis to arrive at yearly opex inflation, ultimately for a buyer to just slap 3% over 10 years and arrive at a price accordingly.

One method that I am eagerly looking into is MonteCristo simulations for Opex inflation (or any other inflation number, terminal cap rates, cap rate appreciation, etc). I know this doesn't answer your question specifically, but I suppose my stance is that other than using 3% regression to the mean number for a 10 year DCF, the only quantitatively realistic measure would be a MC model...

 

http://ardent.mit.edu/real_options/Real_opts_papers/Leung_thesis.pdf

If you're ever bored and are intrigued by MC in real estate...

Simply, I think there are way too many variables to accurately hone in on an OpEx inflation number...or any input for that matter (GPR inflation, terminal cap rates, cap rate growth on a 10 yr DCF to arrive at a terminal cap, etc). Therefore, MC simulations attempt to run thousands of iterations within a certain "parameter" you set to arrive at a result.

I wont go into the detail here, but google it and you might be interested in it. I do think it has real applications especially on a 10 yr DCF model.

NOW, where the real issue lies in my opinion, is what will a buyer model out?. On the acquisitions side, sure these fine tune models can add applicable value to prevent the firm from over-paying. But when you are running a valuation/disposition analysis, you need to employ the metrics that the market/buyer will use. In this case, almost always you'll see a 3% across the board inflation on revenue and expenses...regardless of market or timing. Due to difficultly of modelling 10 yrs of assumptions, on any short-lease type of asset (such as MF, storage, etc), the industry norm is to take a F12 NOI and cap it. Determining market data metrics is much more realistic on a 0-1 yr window...

Hope this helps...

 

Qui autem occaecati doloremque occaecati ipsam at. Rerum aut consequatur dolorum voluptatibus. Dolorem ipsa aut dolorum voluptatem nesciunt adipisci. Minima ut perspiciatis id officiis fuga dignissimos. Molestiae excepturi est in commodi possimus ipsa. Molestiae tenetur placeat ullam doloribus sapiente tempora et. Ipsum et doloribus quia dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”