7 Comments
 

This is always a tough one. To me, there is the endless argument of modelling what you think will actually happen, and modeling what a buyer will model. I can't tell you how many times I've done in-depth market analysis to arrive at yearly opex inflation, ultimately for a buyer to just slap 3% over 10 years and arrive at a price accordingly.

One method that I am eagerly looking into is MonteCristo simulations for Opex inflation (or any other inflation number, terminal cap rates, cap rate appreciation, etc). I know this doesn't answer your question specifically, but I suppose my stance is that other than using 3% regression to the mean number for a 10 year DCF, the only quantitatively realistic measure would be a MC model...

 

http://ardent.mit.edu/real_options/Real_opts_papers/Leung_thesis.pdf

If you're ever bored and are intrigued by MC in real estate...

Simply, I think there are way too many variables to accurately hone in on an OpEx inflation number...or any input for that matter (GPR inflation, terminal cap rates, cap rate growth on a 10 yr DCF to arrive at a terminal cap, etc). Therefore, MC simulations attempt to run thousands of iterations within a certain "parameter" you set to arrive at a result.

I wont go into the detail here, but google it and you might be interested in it. I do think it has real applications especially on a 10 yr DCF model.

NOW, where the real issue lies in my opinion, is what will a buyer model out?. On the acquisitions side, sure these fine tune models can add applicable value to prevent the firm from over-paying. But when you are running a valuation/disposition analysis, you need to employ the metrics that the market/buyer will use. In this case, almost always you'll see a 3% across the board inflation on revenue and expenses...regardless of market or timing. Due to difficultly of modelling 10 yrs of assumptions, on any short-lease type of asset (such as MF, storage, etc), the industry norm is to take a F12 NOI and cap it. Determining market data metrics is much more realistic on a 0-1 yr window...

Hope this helps...

 

Maiores enim nihil et expedita. Voluptas modi quia minus. At repellendus totam saepe explicabo non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”