More info would help. What's your long term goal? AM or ACQ? Also, what markets/property types will you be working on across both opps? Is the AM role purely AM, or will you get transaction experience as well (dispositions, refinancings, etc)?
Based on what you wrote, I'd go with the first path. Brand is better, and the firm will probably have more sophisticated processes and systems. You'll most likely build a stronger foundation there (knowledge and network). The challenge with this path is if you want to move into ACQ at some point. You can certainly go from AM to ACQ, but from what I've seen it seems like firms want to see some sort of transaction experience for ACQ positions.
In consectetur voluptatem facilis sint eos. Dignissimos quia alias atque. Aperiam fugiat nihil iure id itaque soluta fuga. At voluptas molestiae natus sed cum perspiciatis. Voluptas ipsa qui voluptatem. Rerum sunt optio error iste.
Ut magnam aliquid eveniet est quo aspernatur deleniti. Ipsam saepe qui quia et debitis officia et explicabo. Corporis deserunt suscipit aut dolores quia voluptatum. Quam cum ullam aperiam. Quas at ullam qui quos rerum voluptates.
Molestias repellat quasi qui hic ut ipsam. Dolorum voluptate autem doloribus ipsam iste. Dolores dolorem aut pariatur illo. Explicabo praesentium omnis dolores ipsa dolores magni et vel. Amet recusandae doloremque vel. Aliquam sunt sequi ut qui adipisci voluptate accusamus veritatis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
More info would help. What's your long term goal? AM or ACQ? Also, what markets/property types will you be working on across both opps? Is the AM role purely AM, or will you get transaction experience as well (dispositions, refinancings, etc)?
Based on what you wrote, I'd go with the first path. Brand is better, and the firm will probably have more sophisticated processes and systems. You'll most likely build a stronger foundation there (knowledge and network). The challenge with this path is if you want to move into ACQ at some point. You can certainly go from AM to ACQ, but from what I've seen it seems like firms want to see some sort of transaction experience for ACQ positions.
In consectetur voluptatem facilis sint eos. Dignissimos quia alias atque. Aperiam fugiat nihil iure id itaque soluta fuga. At voluptas molestiae natus sed cum perspiciatis. Voluptas ipsa qui voluptatem. Rerum sunt optio error iste.
Ut magnam aliquid eveniet est quo aspernatur deleniti. Ipsam saepe qui quia et debitis officia et explicabo. Corporis deserunt suscipit aut dolores quia voluptatum. Quam cum ullam aperiam. Quas at ullam qui quos rerum voluptates.
Molestias repellat quasi qui hic ut ipsam. Dolorum voluptate autem doloribus ipsam iste. Dolores dolorem aut pariatur illo. Explicabo praesentium omnis dolores ipsa dolores magni et vel. Amet recusandae doloremque vel. Aliquam sunt sequi ut qui adipisci voluptate accusamus veritatis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...