RE Debt | Managing the due diligence process

I'm fairly new to the world of private debt. While I feel fairly comfortable building out a model, I find I have been struggling quite a bit with all of the due diligence. How did you all learn to go through this process? Or what is the process for due diligence at your firms?

Specifically i'm talking about: abstracting leases (understanding all the in's and outs), survey reports, going through construction contracts/documents, insurance, going through 3rd party reports (seismic, Phase I, Zoning, etc), working with legal on documentation.

I'd love to hear all of your experiences and/or how this process works at your firms

34 Comments
 

I just finished my first year UW RE Debt & Equity as a consultant and our clients rely on us to run the DD process so I may be able to help. Lease abstracts - Familiarizing yourself with the sections where the salient information lies will increase your speed. We offshore 90% of the abstracting but follow the same form for every deal. 3rd party reports - All third party service providers follow a unique report format and I can now scroll quickly to find where EGI Consulting vs. Nova Consulting break down their replacement reserves or ADA compliance quickly. I have DD training materials I can send offline. PM me.

Space and place.
 
Most Helpful

I will preface this by mentioning that I work at a large life company that has done lending for 50+ years, so they have this process down pretty well and we have a fair amount of support staff, but essentially, originators handles the memos/term sheets/applications and AM/Closing (with the help of legal) does everything else.

Every deal we do starts with a closing checklist that contains all of the items needed to close (these are generally copied from deal to deal and then tweaked as needed).

We farm out lease abstracts, Insurance is reviewed by our insurance team, and ESA/PSA are handled by our architectural/engineering team. With those items, it is more about getting them paperwork/information and then troubleshooting when something is wrong (insurance coverage is too low, you have vapor issues, a crapload of undisclosed termination options, etc.).

The rest of the DD (legal documents, organizational chart review, appraisal review, etc.) is all handled by the closer. However, I will say our legal is really good about boiling down/creating a list of business items in the docs that we need to decide and handing the rest themselves, so that helps a whole lot.

Honestly, your job is really to identify how far your company is willing to deviate from their standard language and then make sure you color inside the lines. The one thing that you will hear/say a lot is "what have we done in the past." Lenders, similar to judges, don't like to set precedents. With balance sheet lending, it is common to have more than one deal with a borrower. As such, what you don't want is to have not done something/given something away once, and then have it thrown back in your face over and over again (it usually goes along the lines of "...well in xyz deal, you didn't ask for that, why do you want it now"), which beyond creating relationship issues, is how borrowers chip away at your position as a lender over time and make things more favorable for them.

P.S. Usually, when I'm in the middle of heavy due diligence review, I'll book a conference room for a couple of afternoons in a row, put on some headphones and go in there to read/spread shit out.

 

Hi Inspired,

You're question is a little too vague. To put it in a finance perspective you just asked "I want to buy XYZ company, where does one begin?" or "I want to build a house, where does one begin"

Begin from where? We obviously cant type of the whole process in one post (whole text books cover this and not even in good detail), If you have some more specific questions I'm sure we can help!

 

My team closes around 20 deals a year and there are 2 of us in AM/Closing. Our average closing takes about a month so I usually end up with 2 at a time (one will be kicking off just before the other closes). This year was a bit lumpy on the production side so I spent Mar to Jun with no closings and am handing 4 right now with the year end rush.

 

Second this. I work on the lp equity side and when I first started, my md said it takes 5-6 deals before the fog even begins to lift. The biggest thing I struggled with was figuring out how far to get into the weeds. Best rule of thumb i found is to shoot for a 30k ft view of everything and to lean on legal, insurance reviewers, and other players in the process to check your blind spots.

 

3 - 4 weeks isn't unheard of if the Sponsor already has docs/is known to the Lender (or they don't hire crazy lawyers). I've done closings with a known Sponsor in as little as 2 weeks (this was an acquisition where the Sponsor already had third parties that were acceptable to us as Lender).

However, I will say that this year, it seems like every closing I've worked on has taken longer and longer. The last two closings that I've worked on both took closer to 3 months to get everything sorted and closed.

 

Voluptatibus aperiam est non eligendi ducimus pariatur. Exercitationem est odit ut vel sapiente minima est. Harum cumque quisquam quia vel. Mollitia quia est et totam corrupti hic repellendus. Delectus eaque quaerat aperiam vel optio perferendis. Ullam adipisci incidunt cum tempore dolores et ab soluta.

Dolorum quo dolores modi. Ea qui vero inventore praesentium nostrum.

 

Hic omnis cum aut fugit. Ratione et voluptatem ut est ut ipsam nulla. Nobis minima facere voluptatem dolorem quia debitis velit. Quis molestiae illo sed illo libero et. Pariatur magnam omnis ea placeat esse.

Consequuntur cumque qui fuga doloribus beatae. Voluptas maiores voluptatem cum.

Deleniti quas atque eos. Est est nulla non quidem voluptatum provident. Numquam sit fugiat non maxime sapiente quaerat vel. Itaque est odio laudantium consequatur mollitia.

Nihil aut neque odio itaque delectus quia. Cupiditate quos quis fugiat et veniam. Ut provident voluptate recusandae modi. Non explicabo a quae quidem vero rem culpa sit. Ratione odio eum maiores et beatae omnis voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”