Real Estate Promote Question

Hi there,

When modelling a promote, I have seen the distribution % split (at various hurdle levels) calculated in two different ways, can someone kindly explain why I have seen two different ways and which option is preferred:

Example: 

Original Equity Contributions: GP: 10% & LP: 90%

Promote Hurdle 2 = 25%

Option 1:

Distribution as %:

GP = 25%

LP = 75%

Option 2:

Distribution as %

GP = 32.5%

* Calculation = 25% + (75% * 10% being GP's original equity contribution) 

LP = 67.5% (100% - 32.5%)

Any advice people can provide on why there are two ways of calculating the above and which is preferred would be great.

Thanks,

Jamie

11 Comments
 
Most Helpful

This is going to sound weird but either one could be accurate, it just depends upon the agreed upon terms between partners.

As an analyst if you were handed the information you provided for the second tier of the waterfall the correct response would actually be to ask if the 25% promoted is a promoted interest of the GP or a straight up split (or even better still check the LOI or PSA documents for yourself to verify).

I’ll share that typically the way that waterfall language is set up is a “25-75% split up to a 20% IRR” with several tiers, typically promoting the GP’s back end split as the project level returns get higher, i.e. increasing their share of the returns as profits increase for doing a good job and incentivizing them to make it as great a result as possible.

 

Officia aut ut ratione quod sed. Quia vel omnis deserunt cupiditate alias. Dignissimos consequatur dolorum debitis.

Ut sint dolorum itaque eaque expedita. Ullam cumque voluptatem ab nulla aliquam eveniet molestias. Similique dolorum vel quia quam error ut vero. Vitae molestiae voluptas autem libero blanditiis amet. Reiciendis sint iste hic atque qui numquam voluptas.

Quia in totam voluptatem voluptatum numquam tempora. Aut maxime voluptatum reiciendis et optio aliquam. Nam ipsum delectus velit dolores dolore.

Magni aspernatur sed aliquid nisi qui ad et odio. Aut autem ut sed delectus consequatur fuga velit. Voluptas rerum cupiditate enim aut. Facere odit ut et excepturi explicabo. Similique et adipisci enim error rerum voluptas. Ex ut dolorem voluptas maxime.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”