REPE vs. Development
I’m currently doing AM at a REPE firm and am exploring a couple new opportunities.
One would be at another REPE firm doing AM/acq while the other is at a dev shop doing acq (on their investments team).
I don’t have any acq experience. How would these roles vary (aside from the AM component)? What are the pros/cons of each?
Ah, the age-old debate of REPE versus development roles! Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of how these roles might differ and some pros and cons to consider:
REPE AM/Acquisitions: - Variety of Deals: In REPE, especially in acquisitions, you might be evaluating a wide range of investment opportunities. This could range from core investments with a focus on stable, income-producing properties to more opportunistic deals. - Pace: The pace can be faster in REPE compared to development, which might suit someone who thrives in a dynamic environment. - Capital Influence: In REPE, you often play the role of the capital partner, which can be quite powerful. You're the 'King' in the sense that you have significant sway over the deals you choose to fund. - Compensation: Compensation can be very competitive, and there's the potential for carry, which is a share of the profits from the investments made.
Development Acquisitions: - Project Focus: Development roles tend to be more project-focused, dealing with the nitty-gritty details of bringing a project to life from the ground up. - Long-Term Involvement: Development projects often have a longer timeline, which means you could be working on the same project for an extended period. - Hands-On Experience: You'll likely deal with a range of stakeholders, including city officials and contractors, which can provide a rich, hands-on experience. - Personality Fit: Development might be more suitable for someone with a longer attention span who enjoys seeing the tangible results of their work over time.
Pros of REPE AM/Acquisitions: - Exposure to a variety of deals and markets. - Potential for higher compensation earlier on, including carry. - Faster-paced environment.
Cons of REPE AM/Acquisitions: - The job can become repetitive, especially in core groups focused on low-yield investments. - You might be more removed from the tangible aspects of real estate development.
Pros of Development Acquisitions: - Opportunity to be involved in the creation of a project from the ground up. - More hands-on interaction with the physical aspects of real estate. - Potentially more satisfying for those who like to see the direct impact of their work.
Cons of Development Acquisitions: - Longer project timelines can mean slower career progression in some cases. - The day-to-day can be more detail-oriented and possibly less exciting for some.
Ultimately, the choice between these paths depends on your personal preferences and career goals. If you're someone who enjoys the thrill of the deal and fast-paced environments, REPE might be the way to go. On the other hand, if you're drawn to the idea of creating something tangible and are okay with a slower pace, development could be more fulfilling.
Remember, it's not just about the role itself but also the culture of the firm and where you see yourself fitting best. Good luck with your decision!
Sources: Career Advice: Acquisitions vs. Development, Development vs. REPE, Roles Within REPE, REPE Megafund Asset Management Comp, Difference between REPE, GP, LP, debt fund?
Sit incidunt enim est quia. Blanditiis laborum modi occaecati impedit sunt. Quae qui amet reiciendis alias voluptatibus quia tempore facilis. Sit minus quia minus. Amet suscipit vitae iste sit.
Magni atque a nihil dolorem. Praesentium aliquid ipsum atque minus non. Et enim id voluptatem doloribus beatae magni.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...