REPE vs. Development

I’m currently doing AM at a REPE firm and am exploring a couple new opportunities.

One would be at another REPE firm doing AM/acq while the other is at a dev shop doing acq (on their investments team).

I don’t have any acq experience. How would these roles vary (aside from the AM component)? What are the pros/cons of each?

2 Comments
 

Ah, the age-old debate of REPE versus development roles! Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's a breakdown of how these roles might differ and some pros and cons to consider:

REPE AM/Acquisitions: - Variety of Deals: In REPE, especially in acquisitions, you might be evaluating a wide range of investment opportunities. This could range from core investments with a focus on stable, income-producing properties to more opportunistic deals. - Pace: The pace can be faster in REPE compared to development, which might suit someone who thrives in a dynamic environment. - Capital Influence: In REPE, you often play the role of the capital partner, which can be quite powerful. You're the 'King' in the sense that you have significant sway over the deals you choose to fund. - Compensation: Compensation can be very competitive, and there's the potential for carry, which is a share of the profits from the investments made.

Development Acquisitions: - Project Focus: Development roles tend to be more project-focused, dealing with the nitty-gritty details of bringing a project to life from the ground up. - Long-Term Involvement: Development projects often have a longer timeline, which means you could be working on the same project for an extended period. - Hands-On Experience: You'll likely deal with a range of stakeholders, including city officials and contractors, which can provide a rich, hands-on experience. - Personality Fit: Development might be more suitable for someone with a longer attention span who enjoys seeing the tangible results of their work over time.

Pros of REPE AM/Acquisitions: - Exposure to a variety of deals and markets. - Potential for higher compensation earlier on, including carry. - Faster-paced environment.

Cons of REPE AM/Acquisitions: - The job can become repetitive, especially in core groups focused on low-yield investments. - You might be more removed from the tangible aspects of real estate development.

Pros of Development Acquisitions: - Opportunity to be involved in the creation of a project from the ground up. - More hands-on interaction with the physical aspects of real estate. - Potentially more satisfying for those who like to see the direct impact of their work.

Cons of Development Acquisitions: - Longer project timelines can mean slower career progression in some cases. - The day-to-day can be more detail-oriented and possibly less exciting for some.

Ultimately, the choice between these paths depends on your personal preferences and career goals. If you're someone who enjoys the thrill of the deal and fast-paced environments, REPE might be the way to go. On the other hand, if you're drawn to the idea of creating something tangible and are okay with a slower pace, development could be more fulfilling.

Remember, it's not just about the role itself but also the culture of the firm and where you see yourself fitting best. Good luck with your decision!

Sources: Career Advice: Acquisitions vs. Development, Development vs. REPE, Roles Within REPE, REPE Megafund Asset Management Comp, Difference between REPE, GP, LP, debt fund?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Omnis sit ut magnam mollitia. Voluptates sint dolores aut et qui. Nesciunt rerum suscipit accusamus consequatur est velit laborum.

Temporibus expedita est rerum. Possimus velit sit pariatur dolore omnis perspiciatis recusandae minus. Earum rerum eos sequi ab. Aut deleniti optio nisi reiciendis sed. Itaque veritatis velit sed natus. Impedit ipsum voluptatem nihil nulla doloribus ipsa porro.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”