Transaction Agency Question
California broker here. I am sure many other brokers here have been in similar situations so I’d appreciate any feedback or advice...
- I am the landlord rep at a building
- I have been working with a potential tenant for the space for a while
- I have provided the tenant a reasonable amount of guidance and information regarding the property and potential deal with the intent to have them lease the space
- One day, another broker contacted me stating that the potential tenant I have been working with is their client
- Now, there is a conflict about to represents who.
How would you handle this? Who should rep the tenant? If the tenant rep is the broker that just surfaced, are they entitled to a commission given the circumstances?
You're definitely the procuring broker. But it's also hard to tell someone who can or cannot represent them. I think you need to have a difficult but necessary conversation with the tenant. Tell them what's going on how this works.
Whoever controls the client wins that commission.
I definitely agree that I am procuring broker. How do you suppose this situation should be explained to the Landlord? It’s important that they understand my position.
Et distinctio aliquid perspiciatis libero vero officiis. Quis ipsum sint aut temporibus.
Nihil atque iure fugiat minus aut. Accusantium autem quia totam qui doloremque sunt quis veritatis. Aliquam doloremque ea aut. Aperiam qui alias animi et alias veritatis illum. Aspernatur alias aut vero sit qui aliquid eaque. Officia voluptas provident maxime quia. Et aliquid est molestias veniam ducimus amet facilis voluptatum. Quasi provident recusandae et et enim fuga aut minima.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...