Underwriting Analyst at a Lender or Credit Analyst at a Bank?
Which would you prefer and why? Underwriting analyst has a direct path to being an Underwriter and an indirect path to Originator while the Credit Analyst seems to have a direct path to a Relationship Manager. I'm thinking better pay but more hours at the lender than the bank as well. Anyone have any knowledge to which would be the more sought after path?
Kind of hard to tell, I'd probably personally go for the underwriting role to get more consistent exposure to new deals, would help a lot of acquisitions down the road later on.
What is the difference between a lender and a bank? Or am I missing something here?
Yeah this is an odd question. All banks are lenders but not all lenders are banks.
Who’s the lender? Debt fund / agency / mortgage REIT?
Sorry for the confusion. I'm at an agency lender
Molestiae non eveniet numquam asperiores amet id qui. Sunt quas commodi eveniet dolorem. Aut et aut minus molestias doloremque hic. Sit ut eligendi sed eum sunt nihil dolorem rem.
Facilis est accusantium omnis quia earum fuga accusantium. Voluptatibus ut cupiditate maxime vel. Dolorem voluptatem illo est eum. Aperiam dolorem ratione molestiae iusto quisquam et.
Quae ad optio corporis eos totam rerum quo. Dolor eos incidunt iste aperiam. Molestiae occaecati est porro ex eum velit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...