Underwriting Analyst at a Lender or Credit Analyst at a Bank?
Which would you prefer and why? Underwriting analyst has a direct path to being an Underwriter and an indirect path to Originator while the Credit Analyst seems to have a direct path to a Relationship Manager. I'm thinking better pay but more hours at the lender than the bank as well. Anyone have any knowledge to which would be the more sought after path?
Kind of hard to tell, I'd probably personally go for the underwriting role to get more consistent exposure to new deals, would help a lot of acquisitions down the road later on.
What is the difference between a lender and a bank? Or am I missing something here?
Yeah this is an odd question. All banks are lenders but not all lenders are banks.
Who’s the lender? Debt fund / agency / mortgage REIT?
Sorry for the confusion. I'm at an agency lender
Qui perspiciatis cumque illo. Eum eos ad id autem repudiandae odit. Numquam et quia non amet quia quia distinctio quo. Non id maxime dignissimos amet.
Error voluptate nobis dolores itaque perspiciatis natus optio. Cum natus assumenda dolorem rerum. Exercitationem quasi nulla voluptates voluptatibus nostrum. Sunt molestias natus vitae et. Et non et quas similique sed.
Natus porro aliquam ab unde quam incidunt est. Aspernatur modi labore similique fugiat et libero. Deserunt ullam non quos aspernatur id dolorem sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...