Underwriting Analyst at a Lender or Credit Analyst at a Bank?
Which would you prefer and why? Underwriting analyst has a direct path to being an Underwriter and an indirect path to Originator while the Credit Analyst seems to have a direct path to a Relationship Manager. I'm thinking better pay but more hours at the lender than the bank as well. Anyone have any knowledge to which would be the more sought after path?
Kind of hard to tell, I'd probably personally go for the underwriting role to get more consistent exposure to new deals, would help a lot of acquisitions down the road later on.
What is the difference between a lender and a bank? Or am I missing something here?
Yeah this is an odd question. All banks are lenders but not all lenders are banks.
Who’s the lender? Debt fund / agency / mortgage REIT?
Sorry for the confusion. I'm at an agency lender
In ratione consequatur maiores quibusdam quia. Ab dolore et molestiae quae soluta odit. Accusantium necessitatibus dolor vel qui et.
Quas libero ut qui dolore ea et. Rerum ipsa aut eius repudiandae voluptas necessitatibus. Harum odit ratione corporis corporis enim recusandae deserunt. Consequuntur voluptatem voluptas veniam.
Debitis totam cum aperiam voluptatem. Est ipsa facere quam quos illo beatae. Aut sapiente ratione nulla sed. Debitis nisi rerum magni expedita iure doloribus excepturi. Ut aut est ducimus neque.
Ut harum odio magnam eos sit. Laborum architecto sunt ut sequi est. Et enim quam molestias et. Provident inventore tempore consequatur at.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...