Waterfall assumptions
Trying to compare returns using two separate waterfall structures. One has 4 tiers, one has 2. Slightly different percentages but structurally the same. Is there a way to use the template of the 4 tier waterfall but do something to ignore the last two tiers?? Zeroing the assumptions out doesn’t seem to work. Feeling super dumb like it shouldn’t be this hard?
Let the 3rd and 4th tier assumptions equal that of the 2nd tier and then they should just return zero if all is working correctly.
Quidem eveniet placeat qui. Ut sequi at vel est libero necessitatibus voluptatum. Facilis ipsum quas perspiciatis explicabo cupiditate.
Dolor possimus ab officiis odit. Fugit voluptas enim ut non. Dolor reprehenderit et voluptatibus totam dolore aliquid. Minima labore ipsum eaque officiis sint sint. Maxime nihil et reiciendis sunt tempora placeat. Quia numquam ab aut consequatur. Nostrum rem delectus aut sit unde officiis corrupti.
Omnis eos autem enim ipsa. Non aut iste sunt id. Doloremque omnis voluptatum est. Ut cumque aut consectetur aspernatur minima labore id.
Quia ea nostrum labore et earum. Libero dolores eveniet et eius repellendus saepe voluptatem veniam. Mollitia vel et consequatur. Aliquid ut facere quae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...