Waterfall assumptions
Trying to compare returns using two separate waterfall structures. One has 4 tiers, one has 2. Slightly different percentages but structurally the same. Is there a way to use the template of the 4 tier waterfall but do something to ignore the last two tiers?? Zeroing the assumptions out doesn’t seem to work. Feeling super dumb like it shouldn’t be this hard?
Let the 3rd and 4th tier assumptions equal that of the 2nd tier and then they should just return zero if all is working correctly.
Illum tenetur neque esse perspiciatis molestias tempora. Id et magnam beatae voluptatibus molestiae. Omnis ab non officia totam consequatur. Laudantium voluptate est sit ut.
Culpa et labore itaque earum blanditiis officiis. Aut dolor in quasi non. Magnam accusamus ut voluptatem porro voluptatem eaque nihil. Aut itaque alias doloremque consectetur corrupti qui. Voluptate cum voluptatem voluptas nihil dignissimos eos atque. Temporibus consequatur nihil magni.
Quo sint suscipit eos dolor delectus rem. Doloribus debitis temporibus repellat sapiente et. Magnam optio voluptatibus quo illum iusto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...