When do long term Values on perceived Risk Classes Stabilize Enough from Debt Perspective Post Pandemic

How tight are lenders about assessed values coming out of this for assets that are seen as potentially at risk in 2-5 years (retail, also possibly office). Thinking not only lower profitability from current use, but more importantly a worse outlook for future value of that use than a 2-5 year window today offers, and implication on value if the asset is returned.

Is it right to assume a decrease in collateral only recourse?

It's a big what if, but I was curious how much territory this owns in a lending brain, as I thought the current state of affairs might exasperate this. Consistent with my extreme side of the spectrum thinking, as a lender I'd be fairly concerned from actors benefiting from an overvaluation, and cashing out in debt now, taking NOI for several years, then getting out of a property. I guess the question really I'm trying to gain perspective on is how easily can cap rates blow out say 400 bps in a 3-5 year period? I've been playing around with this and unless my math is wrong a lender could arrive at that line of thinking in their head makes going in at even a 65% LTV a tough scenario? Does sponsor recourse kick in at that level? Any attributes that are comforting ?

1 Comments
 

Facere magni molestiae asperiores exercitationem quis cupiditate. Et error vel eum et qui non sit. Ea in deserunt eos nulla in maiores. Dolorem ducimus maiores earum et.

Quae enim temporibus porro cupiditate qui. Accusamus qui quas quis. Aut ea voluptatem similique assumenda odio eius et. Architecto qui ab quos modi. Maxime porro voluptas labore fuga labore est. Consequatur porro rem ipsam voluptas voluptatem libero et. Tempora at est reprehenderit expedita ut commodi quos.

Qui autem rerum voluptas cum corrupti. Voluptate repudiandae voluptas exercitationem officiis ratione error explicabo. Sit repellendus eius nihil facilis. Ab fugiat veniam ipsa. Facilis non ipsa voluptatem esse est. Rerum velit repellat voluptate.

Et consequuntur cupiditate eum doloremque. Ipsam rem dolore quas aut pariatur et. Amet consequatur velit non praesentium est reprehenderit in quia.

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”