Columbia Dual BA vs UCLA

Navigating the decision between UCLA and the Columbia Dual BA program with Sciences Po is indeed a significant one, especially considering your diverse interests in humanities, finance, and international studies. Here's a breakdown based on the most helpful WSO content and insights from previous threads that might help you narrow down your decision:

UCLA: - Philosophy Major with Film Minor Potential: UCLA offers a strong program in philosophy, and the ability to minor in film could be a unique advantage, especially given your interest in both areas. This combination could offer a broad liberal arts education that's beneficial in various fields, including finance. - Traditional College Experience: UCLA will likely offer a more conventional college life, complete with a vibrant campus culture, which many students find valuable for personal growth and networking. - Proximity to Home: While being close to home is seen as a downside for you, it can also be a comfort and logistical advantage, especially in uncertain times.

Columbia/Sciences Po Dual BA: - International Exposure: The dual degree program offers an unparalleled international experience, spending two years in France followed by two years at Columbia. This could be incredibly enriching, both personally and academically, especially since you have a keen interest in international affairs and France. - Prestige and Academic Rigor: Columbia, coupled with Sciences Po, brings together the prestige of an Ivy League institution and one of France's leading universities in social sciences. Concerns about the GS vs. CC stigma are less relevant for Dual BA students, as the program is distinct and highly regarded in its own right. - Financial Consideration: The financial aspect is crucial. Sciences Po's lower tuition for the first two years is attractive, but Columbia's tuition can be steep. It's essential to weigh this against the potential long-term benefits of the program. - Flexibility with Gap Year: The possibility to defer enrollment for a gap year could offer you valuable time to explore your interests further, travel, or gain work experience before diving into your undergraduate studies.

Decision Factors: - Career Goals: While not set on finance, consider where each program might lead you. The Columbia/Sciences Po program might offer more diverse opportunities internationally and in fields like diplomacy, international business, or NGOs, alongside finance. - Academic and Personal Growth: Think about which environment will challenge you more and offer growth opportunities that align with your interests and values. - Financial and Logistical Considerations: Be realistic about the financial implications and the support system you'll have at each location.

Ultimately, both options have their unique strengths and could lead to successful outcomes. Reflect on where you see yourself in the next few years, both in terms of career and personal development. It might also be helpful to reach out to current students or alumni of both programs to gain more insights.

Sources: Booth vs. Columbia for MBA, Yale SOM or UCLA Anderson for investment management?, Picking between LACs or Uni for Undergrad Degree, UCLA, CAL or UW, BC Caroll vs IU Kelley undergrad