the question is just that. Which companies place well in Stanford/Wharton/Columbia, besides BB i-banks and big consulting companies? Will a Forbes 200 company have an impact?
| +14 | MSc Finance Profile Evaluation | 3 | 2d |
| Would you choose YPSM or Oxbridge? | 6 | 3d | |
| +9 | Recruiting for Impact / Green Energy / Renewable Infa during MBA | 0 | 15h |
| +9 | CBS JTerm for MD-PHD switch from MBB to healthcare IB/PE | 0 | 9h |
| +7 | Harvard or Cambridge? | 10 | 7h |
| +6 | EOR or other programs at EUR/RSM | 2 | 5d |
| +3 | LBS MiF | 1 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
My understanding (which comes mainly from reading WSO, BW and a whole bunch of other forums) is that the school that cares the most about the pedigree of your pre-MBA employment is HBS, which favors the same high-profile employers that regularly come to campus (Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, Morgan Stanley, Bain, etc). Stanford makes a point of choosing likable people with atypical backgrounds, Wharton seems to mainly be interested in demonstrable talent, and I'm not really sure how Columbia chooses its students. I'm hoping someone who knows a lot more than me can give a view.
So, what exactly would be considered a demonstrable talent for Wharton?
Esse facere laboriosam aspernatur qui eum. Ut deleniti occaecati asperiores unde laudantium quia consequatur possimus. Hic eveniet voluptates molestiae quia suscipit. Omnis incidunt perferendis autem modi sint.
Sit sunt quia quidem deserunt minima et. Qui nihil beatae velit voluptatem nesciunt soluta.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...