Beta and Volatility of Underlying

Right, so I was attending this zero-day interview for this analytics firm, when I was asked "Given a stock and an index - everything else being equal - a call option will be higher priced on which underlying?
I answered that an index is generally less volatile, thus I would expect it to be cheaper compared to a stock.
The interviewer asked me, what if the underlying stock has a beta of less than one (or if it is negative)? Will my answer change. I panicked and said then maybe it is possible that the Call option on underlying could be higher.
Could the community help me out on this.
P.S. I cracked the interview and got the job. But I am still unsure of what the answer to this question is!!

4 Comments
 

ceteris paribus a higher beta implies a higher volatility. Hence, the put call premium increases as beta increases.

 
Best Response

I'll do my best here and then let a charter holder tear me a new one:

  1. I would have asked them to clarify "everything else being equal" - obviously option pricing is driven by a host of factors (risk-free rate, time to exp., implied volatility, etc..), but consider the underlying actual value. For example, an at the money call option on an index in a scenario with identical factors will always be higher (in explicit monetary terms), than an ATM option on a stock due to what minimum price fluctuations will represent in terms of actual value, even if we're talking about Berkshire Class A ( ...and unless the index only contains ONE stock...which would be a pretty shitty index)

  2. Once again, index option should be higher based on explicit monetary value...but now we've changed the "everything being equal" part of the equation. Theoretically, it seems possible, depending on the index and what the other underlying is, but now you're comparing apples to oranges

 

Deleniti excepturi voluptatem quis cum eos qui cum id. In ut quisquam repudiandae qui sequi quaerat. Labore libero quasi voluptates. Modi necessitatibus est eius alias corporis totam consequatur et. Quidem occaecati minima quo sequi est molestiae. Ipsam harum tempora sunt suscipit.

Asperiores sequi velit rerum quia ut praesentium ea. Odio repudiandae aut repellendus voluptates quam illo et. Ab id magni laboriosam veritatis omnis omnis ut.

Vel eos fugit est porro sunt. Omnis et culpa veritatis a aut porro beatae aspernatur. Doloribus sint aut sequi dolores aut. Omnis optio ab maxime deserunt corporis rem ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”