Difference between natty/power and oil/other?

I have read some comments on WSO that suggest that trading natty/power is relatively more sitting in front of a screen as opposed to more relationship driven than trading other products. Is there truth to this statement and why is that?

talking about physical commodity trading

14 Comments
 

The great divide is physical vs financial.  Trading TI or Brent on the screen is way different than delivery or buying phyical Mars for example.  Same with P&G.  Ask any natty trader on here if they want to be short physical AGT-J in winter.  Ask any power plant operator the same question (hello, Everett!).  Talk to the folks in ERCOT about their being no offer on molecules last winter.  The reason P&G is harder is that we have to do this hourly or minutely depending on the situation.

Ask any Kenyan about the "monkey blackout" or any North American about the "Great squirrel blackout" and you will understand why we all drink heavily.

However the real quant shops are trading only financial and generally vituals.

Namaste. D.O.U.G.
 

So I see this kind of question flying around and it just doesn't make sense to me.  In my experience, traders sit at screens all day they are either taking risk in the market or laying off risk in the market, but the market is on the screen.  You can have a relationship with people via the screen, I have plenty sometimes; I'm the first call, sometimes the last.  I'm also not saying I have never met a counterparty for a happy hour.

I think when most people on here talk about a "relationship" they are referring to stuff like golf, box tickets, etc.  If that's what you mean, those roles are Originators/Marketers.

The fact is the Energy industry really is not that large, whether you're on the financial side or physical side you need relationships to grow your career and succeed.  All of the above applies to power/natty (where I work) and crude/products (tons of friends work).  I don't really think this would be product specific, probably more role or company specific.

 
Most Helpful
energyquant

So I see this kind of question flying around and it just doesn't make sense to me.  In my experience, traders sit at screens all day they are either taking risk in the market or laying off risk in the market, but the market is on the screen.  You can have a relationship with people via the screen, I have plenty sometimes; I'm the first call, sometimes the last.  I'm also not saying I have never met a counterparty for a happy hour.

I think when most people on here talk about a "relationship" they are referring to stuff like golf, box tickets, etc.  If that's what you mean, those roles are Originators/Marketers.

The fact is the Energy industry really is not that large, whether you're on the financial side or physical side you need relationships to grow your career and succeed.  All of the above applies to power/natty (where I work) and crude/products (tons of friends work).  I don't really think this would be product specific, probably more role or company specific.

I have worked on the power and products side... I will say the oil and products side is 10x more relationship driven then the power side 

 

just to clarify, is power synonymous with LPG,LNG and natural gas? Whereas one would classify crude oil, fuel oil, gasoline, middle distillates, naphtha, biodiesel, coal under oil and products

 

Energy --

Agree.  One counterpoint is that traders that I dealt with used to come to the big events / golf / or meetings as well.

Namaste. D.O.U.G.
 

Seems a lot of folks on origination end responding. Anyways its simple homogenous products versus more complicated products that have not developed into standard contracts. 
Majority of natty is traded under a basic nasbe, majority of pipelines have the same “spec gas”, all storage basically works the same. One can find liquidity while hard on basis, knowing its the WAP of physical market.

I never have to care about different blends, specific contract rules, freight, etc…Natty was made to be standardized when it was deregulated. Due to this it will attract more data driven people while other products are less standard/complicated/one-off risk.

 

Est quis harum voluptas numquam provident ad. Quidem facere dolor et culpa aut tempore et. Modi qui velit iure consequatur et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.6%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”