2 Comments
 

Gas hubs like Niagara, despite their low liquidity, can still function as benchmarks due to their regional significance and the specific market dynamics they represent. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some key points to consider:

  1. Regional Relevance: Even with low liquidity, hubs like Niagara may serve as a reference point for pricing in specific geographic areas. Companies operating in those regions might find it practical to use these benchmarks for localized transactions.

  2. Contractual Flexibility: Companies often structure contracts with terms that account for the limitations of low-liquidity benchmarks. For instance, they might include clauses that allow for adjustments or hedging strategies tied to more liquid benchmarks like Henry Hub (HH).

  3. Arbitrage and Path Dependence: Gas is highly fungible, and the logistics of moving it (via pipelines, LNG, etc.) play a significant role. Even low-liquidity hubs can reflect the cost of transportation and regional supply-demand imbalances, making them useful for specific pricing structures.

  4. Supplementary Benchmarks: Companies might use Niagara as a secondary or supplementary benchmark while relying on more liquid indices for broader market exposure. This dual approach helps mitigate risks associated with low liquidity.

  5. Market Dynamics: The willingness to use such benchmarks often stems from the lack of better alternatives in certain regions. Over time, as infrastructure and trading volumes grow, these hubs may gain more liquidity and reliability.

If you're still puzzled, it might help to explore how companies hedge their risks or use tolling agreements to manage exposure to such benchmarks. For more insights, you can explore discussions on WSO forums like the one here: url:https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/oil-and-gas-ov….

Sources: Oil and Gas Overview, State of Credit markets now and in the future?, Best product to trade, Oil and Gas Overview, Why do people invest in hedge funds?

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Animi ipsum velit recusandae sed. Ex quisquam tenetur rerum. Totam aliquam dolore explicabo ea ratione.

Nemo illo corrupti et eum fugiat quia similique et. Unde aliquid optio perspiciatis delectus et et error sunt.

Est consequatur dolor aut quisquam omnis. Sint voluptatem cumque repellendus rem animi. Ea sed qui corrupti dolor dolorem nesciunt dolorum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”