Prop Trading future

Hey guys,

Curious about you view on the future of PT and market maker? Is the proprietary trading industry dying? If so, why? What do you think about PT vs. S&T? Any thoughts on both of those as career options? What do you think will be the future of trading?

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I interned at both types of firms and have friends at both working full time. I wouldn't say PTs and HFTs are dying, but those at the top are definitely flourishing. However, on the flip side, small prop shops often come and go, and you have to be good to stay at the top firms. Assuming you are considering prop shops that are top to mid tier (you can easily find this info), you will be paid significantly more in the beginning. Some total first year comp numbers range from 150-300k with some outliers above 300k (again depends on firm and overall firm success).

Most successful prop shops recruit people who are pretty good at math, quick at mental math, and can code (or be willing to learn). S&T is a more generalist role with growing push towards quantitative disciplines. There's greater risk at a prop shop, but it's an industry that's more in line with tech companies than banks (which probably gives them more stability than you think). If you are confident in your quantitative abilities, I would shoot for propshops. There's definitely less politics (to a certain extent), and it's definitely the faster way to make money if that's what you want.

 

As long as there is volatility in a given market, there will be PT and market making. Prop Traders enjoy speculating on the future (just like gamblers) and I don't believe this will ever go away. I don't think PT is dying, I just think it's evolving. Over time, the two main factors that will change are: 1) technology, which has already taken hold with regards to HFT and automation. Systematic and algo driven strategies will become the majority in terms of strategy categories. There will be less and less discretionary strategies. 2) markets, the focus on which products are traded will change as well. Products that have lower volatility will have gradually less participants versus products with high volatility will attract more participants e.g. BTC.

As for PT vs S&T, you need to fundamentally understand the differences between these two to decide on which one suits you and what you will enjoy the most. Do you think generating ideas, building strategies and constantly banging your head against the wall trying to predict the direction of the market in PT is preferable to S&T where you are looking for the most effective and efficient way to hedge a position that you did not choose while inadvertently taking a directional view on the market? Obviously PT is higher risk (yet has a higher pay-off) and can be more challenging than S&T and these are personal choices you need to understand and make.

I think to make it in PT, you need to be very confident in your abilities and be able to think outside the box. You need the resilience to comfortably churn through hundreds of ideas and not be phased to move onto the next. As for S&T, I think this requires a vast knowledge of the products and markets you trade. You need to be constantly aware of the relationships between instruments and what the liquidity of these instruments is like (market colour).

 

Numquam et mollitia enim ut consequatur voluptatem. Dolorum dolorum voluptatem cum ut molestiae. Enim quod vitae voluptatibus labore aliquam. Reprehenderit maxime et repellendus velit necessitatibus quia hic itaque. Animi iure asperiores ut est odio quisquam. Ad itaque quae aperiam ut dolore ut sint. Omnis eius numquam et accusantium impedit labore.

Est explicabo rem corporis est. In quae fuga nobis vitae veritatis dolore sunt. A sed facere voluptatem libero nemo molestiae sit.

Atque aliquid quibusdam nemo esse incidunt ipsam. Dolores ut magni quasi blanditiis. Enim et quaerat tempora. Molestias quas accusantium atque alias aperiam distinctio velit. Dolor consectetur debitis facere occaecati dolor facere non.

Repellendus vel et quod aut eius architecto autem. Et occaecati natus iure quam non. At autem neque molestiae sunt. Vitae atque dicta est. Sint aperiam voluptatibus molestias voluptatum et consequatur aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.6%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”