Asking Startups Weird Questions in Diligence Calls

I was talking to a friend who works at a different VC firm than mine, and he brought up the fact that they will sometimes ask founders weird questions during diligence calls. 

These questions can range from somewhat mundane (just simply unusual during a diligence call) to very strange trick questions that seem like a trick question for quant roles at hedge funds. 

In terms of mundane questions, some of these would be like "what is your favorite book" or "what seemingly mundane thing do you think can cause a company to fail?" These type of questions, while atypical, do seem to give some useful color to the management team and can probably help you understand how they think.

However, there are other questions they will ask that to me seem rude. An example would be like "when would it be morally wrong to describe a glass as half-full instead of half empty?"

This seems incredibly rude and disrespectful to me; however, I do understand why the firm might think these questions are useful. My friend specifically said that the goal is to truly understand how the management team thinks and to break past any egregiously fake facade they are presenting.

What do you guys think? Do you think even the mundane questions I mentioned are rude?  

3 Comments
 
Most Helpful

I know that some GPs ask these kinds of questions to - as your friend noted - gauge a founder's "true character" and determine their ability to think on their feet. However, I think there is a time and place for this: 1) only the potential board partner should be asking these questions, I think these questions coming from anyone else (associate, principal, etc.) would be pretty insulting, 2) this assessment should be done only after the GP has built a relationship with the founder - asking these questions on a first call would be arrogant and unnecessary, and 3) the GP should be able to explain exactly what they're looking for with each of these questions and why this is the only way to assess those characteristics.

That being said, I've always strongly believed that these "weird" questions are more about the GP's ego than anything else. I doubt there is any meaningful correlation between a founder's ability to respond favorably to these kinds of assessments vs. the founder's ability to build a successful company.

 

I'm at what some might consider a top tier growth shop and I think I'd be laughed out of the room if I ever suggested something like this, even for a GP to ask. End of day you care about the founder's background and their ability to scale that specific business. 'Character' is assessed in how they've answered critical, business-related questions and engage with you - and of course, references / backchanneling. I could see this line of questioning being helpful for a super green, first-time founder who you don't have much context around are making a somewhat blind seed bet on.... but else it should be on you as an investor to build the muscle/reps to evaluate a founder holistically and come to the right call.

 

Iste aut aspernatur ea ut rerum perferendis inventore. Dolores unde repudiandae sint cupiditate eveniet aut. Rerum hic ut ut odio optio quia. Labore quod quaerat consectetur qui non iste dignissimos. Repellendus omnis consequatur ipsam.

 

Consequuntur quidem possimus quis ex nihil et. Sint velit et corrupti corporis porro omnis animi. Rerum optio enim qui atque perspiciatis. Et voluptate rerum quos non eos dolorem esse.

Omnis est non alias et. Accusantium qui odit ut qui corporis provident. Voluptatem in sit consequuntur nobis. Qui sint dolor architecto aperiam. Ex sed consequatur dolor aut maxime quae nihil. Voluptatum quos et et voluptatibus quo.

Ipsam optio ut praesentium consequuntur minima. Quam illum nobis eum aliquid sed distinctio dolores. Dolore voluptate dolores sit.

Ipsum voluptas molestias harum minus ex aut. Nobis voluptate maiores culpa tempora cupiditate. Officia tenetur nobis consequatur adipisci. Veniam est maxime dignissimos accusamus. Autem enim nam quis repellat odit. Accusamus modi vel voluptatem reiciendis.

Hootie

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (47) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (74) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”