Best Venture Capital Resources to Prep for an Interview?

I'm totally bogged down right now from my current workload between my job (CRE lending - bulge bracket) and studying for the GMAT. I came across an open analyst position at a VC firm that I would love to work for that is involved in finance, technology, and real estate. This company has been the only VC firm i've keep my eyes on aside from looking at other traditional real estate PE firms once I finish with my GMAT in 2 months.

It's been awhile since I dove deeper into learning the fundamentals how the venture capital industry underwrote deals and how their models work. Would anyone be so helpful to point me in the right direction where I can get up to speed on modeling and due diligence for the venture capital world?

Also, any PDFs/papers/research/memos related to the VC world would be awesome.

11 Comments
 
Best Response

One:

Here is an https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/learning-about-the-real-estate-v…</a">older thread (August 2017) about real estate VC that another guy and I wrote some lengthy replies in.

Two:

Some books you should read:

The second one is a bit lengthier and more academic, but it has a relatively strong section on structuring.

Three:

Other web resources:

  • Term Sheet (what Dan Primack spent six years editing at Fortune before moving over to Axios to write Pro Rata, now written by Erin Griffith after his departure)
  • StrictlyVC
  • Launch Ticker (from Jason Calcanis, arguably the most prominent angel, sort of this younger generation's Ron Conway)
  • First Round Review
  • Benedict Evans' blog
  • Fred Wilson's blog (https://avc.com/</a">AVC)
  • all of Paul Graham's essays
  • https://Abovethecrowd.com/</a">Abovethecrowd (Bill Gurley's blog)

Four:

Shift the way you think about venture. I don't mean this derogatorily. Maybe you're pressed for time and it's an informal forum, but the way you write conveys that you know little about VC. Deals aren't "underwritten", they're "done" or "funded". 'Due diligence' is a term few people utter. It's 'industry research' and 'reference checks'.

What I'm trying to say is that it's really important to show in all your interactions with the fund that you 'get it'. VC is such a qualitative game. They need to know that you understand all the nuances, speak the language, are conversant on not only deals and industry trends but also on the how people talk ... because that's a thing founders assess. If you look like a square, the fund isn't going to want to hire you because the fund doesn't want to look square.

Read https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/making-a-transition-into-vc#comm…</a">this post I made also in August 2017.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 
"APAE" One:

Here is an https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/learning-about-the-real-estate-v…</a">older thread (August 2017) about real estate VC that another guy and I wrote some lengthy replies in.

Two:

Some books you should read:

The second one is a bit lengthier and more academic, but it has a relatively strong section on structuring.

Three:

Other web resources:

  • Term Sheet (what Dan Primack spent six years editing at Fortune before moving over to Axios to write Pro Rata, now written by Erin Griffith after his departure)
  • StrictlyVC
  • Launch Ticker (from Jason Calcanis, arguably the most prominent angel, sort of this younger generation's Ron Conway)
  • First Round Review
  • Benedict Evans' blog
  • Fred Wilson's blog (https://avc.com/</a">AVC)
  • all of Paul Graham's essays
  • https://Abovethecrowd.com/</a">Abovethecrowd (Bill Gurley's blog)

Four:

Shift the way you think about venture. I don't mean this derogatorily. Maybe you're pressed for time and it's an informal forum, but the way you write conveys that you know little about VC. Deals aren't "underwritten", they're "done" or "funded". 'Due diligence' is a term few people utter. It's 'industry research' and 'reference checks'.

What I'm trying to say is that it's really important to show in all your interactions with the fund that you 'get it'. VC is such a qualitative game. They need to know that you understand all the nuances, speak the language, are conversant on not only deals and industry trends but also on the how people talk ... because that's a thing founders assess. If you look like a square, the fund isn't going to want to hire you because the fund doesn't want to look square.

Read https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/making-a-transition-into-vc#comm…</a">this post I made also in August 2017.

Term Sheet is now written by a lady named Polina Marinova. Erin left about 7-9 months after Dan.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (68) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”