6 Comments
 

thanks, that was really helpful. however, i was wondering more in terms of why bankers think what they are doing is better/more significant than what people in equity research or pwm are doing. in other words, whats bad about equity research and pwm (besides lower pay and prestige)? i hope this question makes some sense...

 
Best Response

In a word (and not that all bankers look down on equity research--quite the opposite actually, as it's a symbiotic relationship), one division is a revenue center (IB), whereas one is a cost center (Research).

It used not to be that way entirely, but there were a lot of bad things going on behind the scenes that required cleaning house. So now we can't even talk to the research analysts without the conversation being vetted.

Banking and research should help each other out in my opinion, but only in an ethical manner--that is, it's great for the research team to roll out coverage on a potential banking client if coverage will help us win business. On the other hand, it's not okay to try to influence the Research Analyst's rating on a company if a "Sell" rating means losing business. And CEOs that operate under that framework are scumbags, anyway (and I've seen it happen!). Probably better not to do business with them as it is.

Aside: PWM is a revenue center, and in my opinion seems like a nice way to make a living if you have good clients. So the "lower pay" tag needn't apply 100% of the time here.

But overall, at the analyst/associate level at least, your best learning experience will hands-down come from banking. That should be what you're shooting for if you're serious about knowing this stuff.

 

Yeah, I think eventually they'll find a way to change the business model yet again and make money.

I'm not up to speed on the prop trading / research stuff entirely, but we've all heard the stories how Stevie Cohen (or some other hedge fund MotU) gets the first call from all the desks and yada, yada, yada.

Very thin line they're walking, in my opinion.

But then again, people tried the independent research thing, and those reports suck horribly.

Who knows.

 

Vel suscipit numquam ut aut. Est dolorem libero id voluptates est voluptatem. Officiis illo optio rerum consequatur. Maxime velit vel odit itaque amet dolor quibusdam. Provident tenetur molestiae doloremque nesciunt.

Culpa sed tenetur eaque consectetur laborum. Similique nesciunt recusandae incidunt optio aut earum maxime.

Laudantium accusantium saepe libero assumenda qui id. Eligendi qui sed rerum ipsam in ipsam. Voluptas laudantium ducimus quisquam quia. Repudiandae doloribus omnis voluptatem veritatis ut cum accusantium. Maxime itaque dolores magni doloremque culpa aspernatur. Suscipit quis odio eum labore minus non dolores.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”