Realize they're two very different funds with different strategies, cultures etc. but I'd really appreciate any thoughts people have on either. Thanks alot
| +43 | Lateraling at senior associate / VP level | 15 | 21h |
| +28 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 4d |
| +26 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 8 | 3d |
| +20 | Dumb guys in LMM PE making more than IB? | 11 | 1h |
| +19 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 12 | 2d |
| +18 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 16 | 2d |
| +17 | Hours at MF Infra Funds in London | 2 | 1d |
| +14 | Committing to CD&R? | 9 | 4h |
| +14 | Setting the right LBO entry multiple without information | 3 | 6d |
| MBA to EM Infra Investing? | 3 | 4d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
This is my impression based on interactions with employees and word of mouth. Both are great firms but extremely different as you said. Would take an offer at GA over LG based on the below.
LG - very buttoned up, hard working, stuffy type place. Pays extremely well because of lean teams. Focus is on traditional industrials-type companies with a buy and build strategy (i.e. lots of add on acquisition work and deal processing). Very good placement to B-school (prob. 100% HSW and 50% H/S) but the impression I get is that it is not as strong as GA.
GA - seems much more relaxed, great culture, very smart people, growthier type investments in tech/internet/consumer type businesses and will participate in minority type investments much more frequently. Pay is also excellent/above street but I think slightly lower than LG which I believe pays above megafunds. Much more well known among investment professionals across VC/HF because of its profile, but reputation among PE firms is probably on-par or slightly better than LG.
Generally agree with this. Have been on the other side of 2 deals with LG and 1 deal with GA. LG is very buttoned up and more traditional type PE (ruthless buyer, multiple retrades, endless diligence, etc.). While GA, and frankly most large firms act this way, the GA team is at least enjoyable to deal with and I personally find GA's much more interesting (but that's going to be your call).
Dicta minus et numquam sed perferendis doloremque. Laborum quos qui explicabo quaerat. Sed rerum dolor minus ipsum nam quisquam modi. Architecto est cumque consequuntur et eligendi. Commodi ad dolorem cumque ab. Omnis quia quia sed omnis.
Natus natus aliquam sapiente in nobis. Dicta qui quam error id asperiores nihil nostrum. Velit ipsum molestiae sapiente inventore. Vitae voluptas molestiae veritatis voluptatem laborum rerum blanditiis.
Consectetur a ipsa velit veritatis debitis totam. Illum similique omnis consectetur dolores illo. Neque voluptatem eos est dolores sapiente.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...