Butterfly Trades Question

Why do the cash and $duration neutral weighting benefit from flattening of the curve and regression weighting benefit more from steepening of the curve? I thought the wings are neutrally weighted? I understand the long end of the bond has a higher duration, hence, the flattening of the curve is favorable, but why does it matter if it's neutrally weighted with the short end? Maybe someone can kindly explain the difference between cash and $duration neutral weighting, fifty-fifty weighting regressional, linear regression weighting (example: regression is 0.5, which means 20 bps change in the short wing would imply a 10 bps move in the long wing spread.) and maturity weighting and the different purposes of these methods?

 
Best Response

agree with Martin...and to add a bit of color (assuming you are looking at US interest rates)...first, there are micro and macro flies. Micro would be something like 5yr-6yr-7yr fly. or EDH9-EDM9-EDU9 (usually guys trying to fade a specific flow in a security that quickly creates a kink in the curve) Macro would be 5yr-10yr-30yr....or even 10yr-20yr-30yr...things with lots of duration inbetween the legs.

With the micro butterflies, you would usually use 50/50 DV01 weights on the wings...but with the macro flies, you will often find that the fly movement is usually dominated by one of the wings in certain market environments.

Environment right now is composed of a few things 1) fed rate hikes, and the timing of market expectations 2) trump tax policy effects (increased debt issuance, etc..) 3) asset allocation (with the stock market making record highs, you would expect a rebalance into the long end) 4) etc...

some of these things have conflicting effects...others magnify...but for each, the market is telling a story...and its your job to understand the story (so you can find / anticipate the turning points)

so, if we dive in and look at the 5yr-10yr-30yr fly...the natural place to start is the 50/50 fly.

short 50k DV01 5yr long 100k DV01 10yr short 50k DV01 30yr

so, if the market rallies 10 bps in parallel, you will make 1mm on the long 10yr, and lose 500k in both the short 5yr and short 30yr positions. This is the "neutral" butterfly.

But what if when the market rallies, its not in parallel...what if the rally has to do with insurance and pension fund investments...but has nothing to do with anticipated Fed rate hikes...the front end out to the 5yr probably won't move much...but the 30yr will move A LOT. In this scenario, the 30yr wing will outperform, and this 5-10-30 fly will have real PnL driven mostly by the 30yr leg. In the reverse, if the market is at an inflection point regarding fed rate cuts/hikes...then the front end will be the primary mover. So this is why you might use PCA weightings to neutralize those effects. When trading a butterfly, you are trying to capture the richness or cheapness of the belly, given the backdrop of the environment...and so you might have to change the wing weights...for example, instead of 50/50, you might use 70/30...or whatever you find in your analysis to be the most stable given the environment.

Now, lets move to cash neutral. This is something that real money accounts like pension funds use to express a view on the market, and a couple other things. A pension fund might go long 100mm 5yr notes short 200mm 10yr notes long 100mm 30yr bonds

This position will behave essentially just "long the 5yr notes" because 100mm 30yr bonds is about DV01 equal to 200mm 10yr notes. Why would they do this? Maybe that have a mandate to be cash neutral? There are lots of reasons. Maybe they want the 10/30 flattener ad to be long the 5yr and they track that portfolio? Anyway..just realize that these are very different things.

Regression is shortcode for "liner regression" (traders are lazy) You use a regression to find the PCA weights.

just google it...you're welcome
 

Repellat similique ut minus est debitis. Minus debitis quia architecto quidem vel soluta neque. Voluptatem voluptatem dolores quis ducimus itaque qui officia. Repudiandae sed quam excepturi debitis sed asperiores tempore. Debitis non quod minus excepturi aliquid cupiditate.

Non consequuntur nulla optio harum beatae et dolores. Aut soluta quisquam dolorem ea possimus ea. Sint consequatur animi quia.

Blanditiis dolorem voluptatem et aut aut. Assumenda quae illum modi ut officia quod reiciendis rem. Aut rerum reiciendis accusamus at aut. Magni sunt consequuntur doloribus qui. Ut vitae accusamus consectetur delectus ut vero quis. Soluta laudantium odit et sit quidem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”