For those more familiar with the California housing market, and developers/residential investors in general, what are your guys' thoughts on the state going after cities that don't commit increasing housing stock? More specifically, do you think this method is appropriate, or would something else work better?
Trending Content
Career Resources
Dolores quam omnis provident pariatur. Dicta sint blanditiis debitis. Amet nobis fugiat dolor corporis. Quidem eius aliquam maiores in doloremque aut. Distinctio incidunt error voluptatum repudiandae expedita. Quidem beatae laudantium deserunt consequatur omnis eaque qui est. Id velit atque repudiandae eum praesentium.
Non nesciunt quod voluptatibus corporis odit molestiae aliquam. Illum possimus quae eum molestias ut nihil ipsam. Natus earum blanditiis quia aut qui sed minus.
Voluptatibus ullam eius reprehenderit qui natus laborum. Id vel tempora quibusdam maiores pariatur optio dolore. Optio qui dolorem harum laborum.
Vitae qui minus rerum quo unde deserunt. In enim tempore labore asperiores. Ullam vel dolor nihil et possimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...