Censoring Hydroxychloroquine
Why did big tech just silence the video of a group of doctors/physicians that support the use of hydroxychloroquine for treating Covid 19 when it's a very cheap and widely available solution that will greatly lower the death rate? It's been around for over 60 years. Maybe because this pandemic has been politically weaponized by the media and the left to create the worst possible situation for Donald Trump's re-election?
jesus christ
Because it was the same group of doctors who claim that HIV doesn't cause AIDS? Not to mention that they claim vaccination causes autism.
Grow a brain.
You might be the biggest moron on this website
not going away anytime soon
Hydroxychloroquine is not a cure for COVID-19. It doesn't do anything, much less "greatly lower the death rate."
The doctor in question talks about disease spread through having sex with demons. Not kidding.
Twitter, as a private company, is free to do whatever it wants. This is a thoroughly conservative and free market point of view.
The pandemic hasn't been "politically weaponized." America could end the pandemic, even now, in approximately 4-6 weeks if people wore masks and stayed the fuck home like in every other first world country, but we failed, so here we are.
You are personally making this site a less intelligent, less rational, and less valuable place. Stop spreading bullshit conspiracy theories and stop making threads about blowback to your bullshit conspiracy theories.
Milton my guy, do you put WSO lurker under the interests section of your resume?
Hey buddy, never said it was a cure I said it was a good treatment. Nice of you to nitpick 1 of the doctors of the big group! And I'm actually provoking different thoughts and ideas than the mainstream provides to people, so good on ya!
Well, have the democrats at least given not having sex with demons a try? It seems like there's no harm in pursuing all possible paths to ending the virus.
the democratic party is already getting fucked by enough demons right now, they're good
Headline news: Big tiddy goth demons spread the rona
The pandemic hasn't been "politically weaponized"? Do you follow the news or even stay up to date on politics. Genuinely curious because this take genuinely baffles me. I don't have a political dog in this fight, but you have to be either joking or incredibly misinformed. Nancy Pelosi calls COVID-19 the "trump virus", Trump calls COVID-19 the "China virus", democrats and republicans have been at tooth and nail debating the merits of reopening the economy, Trump has claimed the democrats called him xenophobic for limiting travel to China when the outbreak started, and there have been heated debates between allowing protests to happen during the pandemic while allowing churches and other businesses to stay closed. Do you want me to continue? To claim that COVID-19 is not politically weaponized when it has been at the forefront of political debate for months is unfathomable.
I genuinely hate talking politics and like to avoid it, but c'mon man do better.
agree with all of this, the virus might just be one of the most politicized and polarized things we've seen in a long time, and both sides of the aisle are at fault
Your lack of reading comprehension baffles me. In the opening post, QAnon boy said:
Since my post was clearly in response to his first post, my 4th point was also clearly in response to this statement as a whole, which was, and remains, bullshit. The rest of your rant is utterly irrelevant, since you are arguing against something that you misinterpreted.
So like you said, do better.
I too, found it odd that a medicine which was shown to be safe with another virus was immediately cast aside, but I'm not a medical person so what do I know.
also, I'm not one to disparage someone's medical expertise just because they hold views that others may disagree with
at the same time, if you think a cyst is due to demon sex in your dreams, you've lost me.
epic troll, 10/10
I agree with this. I’m not medical professional, but there are limits where I can draw the line.
Much like I’m no attorney, but I know robbing a store at gunpoint isn’t legal.
It also seems (from minimal research on my part), that other countries have stated it isn’t effective. Not sure if this is entirely accurate, but I would like to see views from outside America where things seem less biased.
There have been trials in the US and in other countries. It is not effective.
I think you may be lost, let me help you find your way back: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/
Take this shit to Reddit.
Officia praesentium laboriosam distinctio. Neque eius ea laudantium quam consequatur et.
Ut nam fugiat repellendus assumenda consequatur odit repellat. Enim sint harum dignissimos. In architecto quod quidem sit repellendus voluptatem.
Ipsa ipsa et earum provident fugit. Sit quia tenetur veniam consequatur. Est aut quam eius. Consequuntur ullam sit non adipisci sequi voluptatum quia quaerat. Nulla id blanditiis eveniet est et adipisci molestias tempora. Et quasi officiis eum explicabo sit cumque incidunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Amet quae ea corrupti velit iure. Aut ab autem architecto blanditiis facilis autem nihil. Voluptates expedita labore aut. Dolores officiis blanditiis qui id commodi facilis. Et omnis tenetur sed modi rerum dolorem in odit. Nam necessitatibus ratione enim.
Eum voluptatem dolor eos perferendis. Sapiente optio et voluptatem error et. Placeat enim reiciendis omnis voluptatibus dolor molestiae. Quia reprehenderit quas rerum adipisci rerum quia.