I was in the same boat at you in my first Corp Dev. Role. The lifestyle was better but I had regrets about the move I made from IB given the comp was not market, obscure progression among other issues I had with the role (to be fair, some of the issues fell at my feet as well). I did a fair amount of PE recruiting.

Fortunately, I was able to move another Corp Dev role as bump in title and compensation where I enjoy the role a lot more. I would say take some time for introspection and see if it is Corp Dev itself or the role with the Company that is causing this sense of regret.

 
Most Helpful

Totally relate. I transitioned to Corp Dev recently and as an introvert it's making me question whether the field of business/finance is for me altogether. Like maybe I should be a software engineer.

Corp Dev has given me some pretty good C-suite exposure, work experience that college-aged me would consider "sexy" (though slow now with COVID), but for some reason, I'm just not feeling it. The work and exposure is cool and all but so what...so what... it's a lot of BS at the end of the day and I feel like the only ones who make it to the top are those who know how to sell. At the end of the day I'm just a slide/excel monkey filtering info for some overpaid moron execs. BD/Sales are far more important than Corp Dev (at least in my industry).

Absolutely not feeling progression right now. There'll be none. Wondering if I should go back to old job or acquire MBA but MBA would negatively affect my personal life.

 

I'd say after doing two separate stints in Corporate Development, I will say the following....the work is interesting most of the time and you get to be "in the know" with the execs but from a career trajectory perspective it isn't that much different than a finance person within the organization (neither is the pay).

With that said, corporate development is a mixed bag so there could be some companies that offer the perfect combo of comp, work experience and hours (most likely tech) and some that are absolutely awful to work for.

I would entertain the idea of going back into Corporate Development but I think I would be much more picky about the company itself vs. just trying to get a corp dev job. I think I'd lean towards trying to find a start-up and trying to have some sort of equity / skin in the game (which I think might be sort of rare).

 

Hi BankerC159, I'm definitely not seeing a long term future at my Corp Dev role, though I have learned ALOT and gained a lot of great M&A experience due to the responsibility I've got. Just not seeing the progression. Wondering how and what did you exit to after your Corp Dev role? Did you try IB/PE/VC or consulting or something else? I'm still pretty young so trying to figure out if I should try to land another Corp Dev role with more progression (at a startup as you say), try for an Associate role at IB to get that branding (though IB work seems terrible and a lot worse than what I do in Corp Dev), or get an MBA?

 

Depends on what you want to do long term....

I left Corporate Dev (at a Director level) to go work for a MM bank because even if I wanted to get the more "high profile" Corporate Development jobs, I think I needed to have some banking experience. I spent the majority of my time looking into IB and PE with a decent amount of bites but none of the elite/BB or top banks even looked in my direction. It's tough to exit to IB/PE from CD without previous IB experience.

I think you have to try to figure out what you want to do long-term, which I know is an unfair question to ask someone so early in their career but the paths are different, IMO. Although probably the traditional route / general answer is to just lateral to a reputable bank as an analyst / associate, then re-assess (could go MBA/PE/VC afterwards).

 

It hasn't been so bad, I honestly was getting pretty restless in Corporate Development...things would just move too slow (when I wasn't on a deal, I was prob working from home every day and putting in maybe a couple of hours a week....only really go into the office for a weekly 30min meeting with exec team). I suppose if I was in the sunset of my career and had a family, that would be ideal...but since I don't have a family, I don't mind working more for more pay.

I think the COVID situation has actually helped since there is a much more of a slow ramp into work and I'm able to have some time to pass my FINRA exams. The other thing is working for the MM bank the hours aren't as bad and clients aren't as demanding, so its a good fit for me at this point in my life.

 

I started in corpdev right out of college. At both jobs - my hours are/were on the higher end for a corporate role - probably 60-70 hours avg week, 80+ hours in crunch time (we have a lot of crunch time), but I don't mind it.

However, I'd jump off a building if I were moving around PPT logos, etc. for that amount time - but the work is usually super interesting and fairly impactful, except for some of the reporting and operational stuff that I get pulled into since we run a very lean/ flat organization. Also have had super high visibility in the org - last job my boss reported to the C suite, this job my boss is C suite, and I work with them frequently. I consider the hours a fair trade to participate in the sausage making at the highest levels. In the spirit of disclosure, my comp package is pretty good and I am in a cheap area.

I honestly don't really have a plan except to keep doing what I've been doing. I just got promoted, though its more a title change than anything else as my responsibilities, etc. have grown and evolved pretty organically and there's no major change coming with the new title. As long as we stay acquisitive and I keep my boss/ management happy, I'm good. I've gotten some inbounds from recruiters for other corpdev/ MM PE, but nothing that really piques my interest. If we get bought one day, I'll get my equity payout and then figure it out from there.

 

As others have pointed out, corp dev is a mixed bag, and your experience is highly dependent on the company you work for and the team you work with. Corp dev is not like IB where even if you're at a "no-name" boutique, you still get similar experience to those at GS/MS (obviously on a smaller scale and sometimes with less complexity). In corp dev, you could be at a company that talks about M&A, but never engages in it, and unlike in IB, you can't just "switch teams".

I empathize with the comp "issue". I took a ~50% pay cut after I left IB for corp dev, and while it was frustrating seeing my friends who stayed in IB make twice as much or sometimes more than I did, I always reminded myself that I took that pay cut for better hours. It's a trade off.

 

‪I went corporate strategy -> operations in our company’s management development program. My pay went up a little, but my weekly hours, stress, responsibility practically doubled. Nevertheless I’m more satisfied .

Use your time in corporate development/strategy to build up your network, as you often have an amazing access to top brass. It makes jumping into a functional role a lot easier.

That being said, that’s one of the reasons I jumped. If you stay in corporate strategy too long, especially if you got in straight out of school, eventually you’re pigeonholed and there’s not much runway ahead

 
numbermassager:

I went corporate strategy -> operations in our company's management development program. My pay went up a little, but my weekly hours, stress, responsibility practically doubled. Nevertheless I'm more satisfied .

Use your time in corporate development/strategy to build up your network, as you often have an amazing access to top brass. It makes jumping into a functional role a lot easier.

That being said, that's one of the reasons I jumped. If you stay in corporate strategy too long, especially if you got in straight out of school, eventually you're pigeonholed and there's not much runway ahead

 

I spent ~8 years in Corporate Development at a Fortune 500. I was fortunate in the fact that M&A was a core focus at the company and I was exposed to a lot of deal activity over the years (14+ deals). I personally was not interested in a Corp Dev / FP&A role that is commonly found at less acquisitive companies. Due to some luck through attrition and capitalizing on the opportunity, I was able to get a lot of great deal exposure early on in my career.

With that all said there were definitely some positives and negatives to the experience.

**Pros: ** * The deal experience was great. I was able to take on roles well beyond helping with the internal processes early on in my career (source, manage/lead and negotiate deals after my 3rd year at the company). Again some of this was due to attrition and being at the right place at the right time. I left feeling very confident I can take a deal from sourcing to closure on my own if I ever wanted to move back into M&A (Corp Dev, PE, Family Office, Search Fund, etc,)

  • The C-Suite exposure was great. I was regularly in meetings with the C-Suite and other execs at the company. It did take a few years to grow beyond the Excel / PPT jockey in the corner who was there to provide quick answers to nuanced / detailed questions. The exposure to how the C-Suite operated was valuable. It was very interesting to see how are made (more on this in the cons).

  • Great Network: Many of the senior leaders have move on to take C-Suite roles at other companies. If I ever want to move back into corporate, there are a number of CEOs and CFOs I would feel very comfortable calling for advice/referrals/opportunities .

Cons:

  • The pay relative to PE is lower and there is no upside opportunity outside of an annual bonus. No matter how the acquisition performed, pay did not change.

  • I often felt that my opinions on deals were completely irrelevant. At the end of the day, you are not the decision maker, even if you become a subject matter expert in an industry or niche. I would never expect to have my opinion matter much as an analyst/manager, but by the time I made Director I felt as though I was able to contribute a lot of very specific industry experience on acquisitions. I cannot count the number of times I disagreed with the decision to move forward or pass on a deal. Executing a transaction that you do not believe in can be frustrating. This may not be unique, but it was a major frustration for me personally.

  • Often times strategic decisions would be made well before any work on a project was completed. We'd conduct analysis and research to support a decision vs. use analysis and research to help reach conclusions. I definitely got sick of doing work to go through the motions and facilitate internal procedures and processes. Work simply felt like busy work at times.

  • Corporate politics. The company valued individuals who "played the game" vs, actually did the bulk of M&A execution.

  • Diligence team members came from operating companies and were assigned to conduct diligence on top of their day job, Team members were often inexperienced, not motivated and difficult to manage.

Happy to answer any additional questions.

 

I can definitely relate to your points.

The two cons that resonated with me the most were:

  • Decision making - As a CD lead you are more of a conduit to get deals done and shepherd a process. At the end of the day, the business unit head is the one who is driving the go/no go decision. CD may have some input on valuation but from a strategic point of view the executive that will run the business post close....which makes sense since it will fall under his/her P&L.

  • Internal Diligence Team - It can be pretty frustrating at times (probably more often than not) to work with internal diligence folks. As you mentioned, doing diligence isn't their day job and its really tough to keep people on deadlines. Also, if these people are seasoned with M&A - a lot of times they don't really know what to look for....which puts the onus on the CD lead.

 

Totally agree re: diligence teams. I always thought it was a good idea to have functional diligence expert in each area (ops, sales, finance, etc.) to help guide the operating companies through a deal process. Almost like an internal consultant to help operating companies execute DD. We toyed around with that idea, but it never went anywhere. I know some companies (Fortive for example) would insert diligence teams to conduct 100% of the DD on behalf of the portfolio company. Personally I thought the hybrid approach above was worth exploring.

Huge issues can easily be overlooked when a diligence area lead doesn't know what they are doing and is not armed with the proper help. It would often fall on the CD lead to try and catch issues/risks/etc. during diligence meetings and guide leads in the right path, but execution was difficult. It personally benefited me because I feel comfortable knowing what to look for (at a high-level) in diligence areas outside of my expertise (i.e. sales, HR etc.). With that said, the company was overlooking/missing key diligence issues / risks that affected negotiation, integration, synergies, etc.

 

Bump - not in corp dev but in a corp strategy role. Feeling the same way re: pay and career progression, particularly after starting in an IB role prior. Initially thought I would go long term in corporate after the move but not sure anymore. Has anyone moved back into IB or made a move into another financial services role after a corporate stint? Have 1.5 years IB experience and corporate since then. Not sure if it would make sense to move sooner rather than later (1 year vs 2-3 years) before I get more stuck.

 

Happy to chime in here with my two cents. For context, I transitioned from a Corporate Development/Strategy role at a Series C CPG startup to a PE Associate role at a small consumer shop (~20 people) a few months ago. While both roles are in the consumer sector, the verticals are quite different. Including the two main drivers for pivoting directions away from CD&S:

  •  Bureaucracy: This problem will likely remain if you  move into a buyside role at a larger shop, but this was ultimately the catalyst for my decision to leave CD&S. Despite working at a startup, the leadership team and many junior employees had spent the majority of their careers at large organizations, which resulted in an enormous amount of red tape around decision-making, advancing projects through the pipeline, etc. I initially found value in learning these processes; however, my view eventually soured when I realized how much they truly delayed momentum with our workstreams. This also ties into corporate politics (Hirchajd mentioned this above as well) as I realized many folks spent a lot time playing into "corporate games" versus focusing on the actual execution of tasks, which is disheartening when you're working around the clock on a deal. I would like to emphasize that this may not be the case everywhere, but moreso just my particular experience. 
  • Career Progression & Compensation: While this was not the core driver of my decision, I had a hard time remaining intensely motivated to work for my base salary and an annual bonus solely driven by company performance. Conversely, the PE role I'll be stepping into has significant upside based on deal size and performance, which I personally find a bit more rewarding. 

In spite of the above, I am incredibly grateful for my time in spent in an Corp Dev. I personally believe that working in an operational role for 1-3 years is invaluable if you're an aspiring investor as you'll intuitively possess a sense of empathy for your investments and their management teams that your peers may not (this was a constant complaint of our C-Suite dealing with a Board of career investors). I would like to stress that all of this is bespoke to my experience and just my .02 - hope this was helpful and happy to answer any additional questions. Best of luck!  

 

How long were you in your CD&S role and did you have other prior experience? Was your CD&S role more corp dev (internal M&A) or more towards strategy & operations of the company? I'm currently in a strategy group at a large CPG company with only a year of IB experience before in a different coverage group. Have thought a lot about eventually trying to get into some sort consumer investing role mainly to align more with my interests but also for faster comp / career progression but wasn't sure what opportunities there would be coming from a corporate role. Could you speak a bit more to your recruitment process as well? 

 

Incredibly helpful 2 cents from you. I do face the same problems and it doesn't help that the in house experts are colleagues with other full time responsibilities. That has slow things down and create unnecessary delays in the workstream

 

I have no regrets.

I didn’t join CD to do it long term. It was always a stepping stone right after law school to allow me to get into PE. I joined a CD group that is “pure” deal work. Strategy is done by another group (unlike the CD internship I did in undergrad which was very much a hybrid group). I am getting to experience the entire deal process in a heavily regulated industry (and my previous CD experience was in a different heavily regulated industry) from an investor perspective in a way where I have regular contact with PE firms in my industry.

I have been talking with PE firms and headhunters and I am in a strong position for PE roles. Will I end up at a KKR or Blackstone? No. But outside of one specific team within those types of firms, I don’t want to.

 

Officiis suscipit eum id omnis. Ipsum qui ipsam reprehenderit natus sunt. Est et molestias magnam et sed accusantium maxime similique. Ipsa veritatis voluptas quos et dolorum deserunt. Est aut ea voluptas aperiam consequatur quo omnis. Optio dolor repellendus quis velit illum qui cum. Quia explicabo beatae culpa minus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”