EBITDA Multiple Basic Question
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +26 | MFPE Analyst Program vs MMHF Acad | 20 | 2h |
| +19 | PhD student with questions regarding long term HF planning | 5 | 2d |
| +15 | What’s next for 40y with good career | 14 | 3h |
| If you know HF is your end goal, is IB + PE actually worth it? | 7 | 3d | |
| +14 | Pitching a short when they're long? | 33 | 8h |
| +14 | "Expected GPA" on apps | 5 | 4h |
| +9 | London industrials IB to HF - how to prepare | 3 | 5d |
| +6 | Feedback on Vic pitch | 6 | 4d |
| +6 | Liquid Credit at LO vs. Multi-Strat HF | 2 | 7h |
| +6 | Birch Grove / Third Point | 1 | 2d |
Career Resources
On the face of it I'd assume 8x EV. The capital structure of basic equity doesn't really equate to EBITDA.
an EBITDA multiple corresponds to a company's enterprise value
8x is the EV. back out the debt part of the capital structure to get to equity value.
Yea, I agree with the guys that posted above. At the risk of beating a dead horse. If they had preffered shares, and pensions as well, these should also be taken off the EV to get to common equity value
Acquisition multiples should always be EV.
Multiply ebitda by 8, this gives you the implied enterprise value of the transaction. Net out debt (net), minority interest, etc to arrive at equity value. Lol, dead horse.
EV/EBITDA, hence you'd be referring back to the enterprise value.
Aliquam omnis totam iste vel non ut et. Sed consequatur velit quidem voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...