Exit-EBITDA DCF Approach

When modeling a DCF, I have always used both the Exit-EBITDA and Perpetuity Growth methods as a way to calculate terminal value. But, the more I think of the Exit-EBITDA multiple approach, and what it exactly is doing, I get sort of confused.

If Company A's terminal year has EBITDA of $50 Million, and I calculated an Exit EBITDA multiple based on Company A's peers of 6x, then theoretically my terminal value of Company A would be $300 million. What I really don't understand is, why is that just the value of the terminal value and not the value of the Enterprise Value? Obviously on a relative valuation standpoint, taking a comp multiple and applying it to your target's EBITDA in that period should give you the value of is EV. So why is it different for a DCF, that by doing that exact same practice, that just gives you the value of your TV. Which, is the sum of cash flows out into perpetuity beyond your terminal year. How exactly does that equate, and why is it that this would solve to be the sum of all cash flows out into perpetuity after, say terminal year 5, and why is that number any different than calculating the company's EV in that given period?

 
Best Response

On the difference between TV and EV:

Because you're valuing the company today. Let's say your terminal value is in 10 years time, so you get your multiple, apply it to EBITDA in 10 years, and you have what the company is worth in 10 years time. You then discount that back to today to get PV.

In addition, between now and 10 years time, the company will have (hopefully) made money, so there is value there as well - that's why you discount all the FCF in your forecast period to present value.

Wasn't really able to follow the rest of your post, sorry. Are you asking why exit multiple / perpetuity growth methods are considered to be interchangeable for calculating TV in a DCF?

 
thewaterpiper:

On the difference between TV and EV:

Because you're valuing the company today. Let's say your terminal value is in 10 years time, so you get your multiple, apply it to EBITDA in 10 years, and you have what the company is worth in 10 years time. You then discount that back to today to get PV.

In addition, between now and 10 years time, the company will have (hopefully) made money, so there is value there as well - that's why you discount all the FCF in your forecast period to present value.

Wasn't really able to follow the rest of your post, sorry. Are you asking why exit multiple / perpetuity growth methods are considered to be interchangeable for calculating TV in a DCF?

Bingo. It is the TV, just in X years time. Between now and X years, the company generates FCF (or at least we hope) and thus that needs to be taken into consideration. Of course we also need to discount the TV in X years time to today.

Blue horseshoe loves Anacott Steel
 

Aliquam veniam aperiam inventore veniam reiciendis. Voluptatibus et reprehenderit quam et quas a. Inventore aut rerum iste.

Perferendis ipsam molestias debitis omnis eum recusandae laboriosam. Mollitia qui id repellendus non consequatur.

Officia maxime voluptates aperiam et magni. Placeat eos sit eligendi nulla. Molestiae culpa velit aspernatur et aperiam veniam eligendi. Voluptatem voluptatum repellendus assumenda perspiciatis voluptatem neque quae. Qui accusantium iste facere quis sit quae earum.

Cum sint aperiam placeat qui ab odio. Consequuntur aut aperiam sit odio nisi laborum. Nam expedita et sit reiciendis adipisci. Possimus est qui explicabo nesciunt quia est quae. Eveniet necessitatibus rem mollitia non laudantium.

"An investment in knowledge pays the best interest." - Benjamin Franklin

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”