Federal Practice Consulting Salary

I am a junior military officer 2 yrs from separation and have seen a couple recruiting programs from BAH and Deloitte's Federal Practices.

Does anyone have any experience with these? I know the prestige is less than MBB, hours are better, but what about the pay?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

 
Best Response

This is all anecdotal so it may be different for you, but these headhunting and consulting firms realize that former military officers have few marketable skills (unless a STEM undergrad) and minimal relevant experience in the private sector so they will totally low-ball your salary in return for guaranteeing employment before your discharge date. Of course, the hours will be better simply because you don't face the prospect of deployments.

The nature of the work is facilitating defense contracts. You'll end up reporting to other former military officers who were more senior than you in a workplace environment that will be very similar to the military. You'll need to be familiar with your branch's acquisitions, the decision process, the terminology and how funds are allocated in different accounts to finance these purchases.

If selling to the government is something you're interested in pursuing, my advice would be to get out, get an MBA, network, start a company, and surf https://www.fbo.gov/ to become an independent government contractor yourself.

 

pre-manager salaries at both firms are on par with any other practice in the firm, meaning Deloitte's Fed pre-manager salaries are the same as their commercial. However, when you get to manager, it changes....it will now additionally be dependent on how much business you can bring in.

hrs are really good too comparing to commercial counterparts, less traveling though. also, i would discourage anyone from working at BAH. the firm is going downhill and lots of people are either getting laid off/exiting

 
mashed potatoes:
i worked in federal practice and at least in my firm it was the same.

70k + 10k sb for deloitte? thats bullsh*t. i have plenty of friends in chicago, houston and atlanta who began their careers at deloitte as a business analyst and started off much less...more like 60k. your exaggerating big time

Starting offers across the board for the commercial practice were $70k + $10k the last couple years. The federal practice is practically a different company altogether. Different culture, different work, different competition, and different (lower) pay. BGP2587's numbers were spot on.

"Buy gas. It's a sure-fire commodity with no risk except for the sure risk of fire." - Stephen Colbert
 
mashed potatoes:

i worked in federal practice and at least in my firm it was the same.

70k + 10k sb for deloitte? thats bullsh*t. i have plenty of friends in chicago, houston and atlanta who began their careers at deloitte as a business analyst and started off much less...more like 60k. your exaggerating big time

It's not bullshit at all. For offers given out this recruiting season, the base salary for Deloitte S&O Chicago was between 70-72K, which is in line with other management consulting firms. Signing bonus on top of that. (No performance bonus for BAs, though, I don't think.) So all the others are spot on.

 

The following numbers apply to the Tech practice. 70K for Analysts in 2011. In 2009 and 2010, the base pay was 65K for the incoming class. Deloitte adjusts the base pay every two years, so the Analysts this fall should be getting 70K as well. I don't have any information about the sign-on bonuses. From my limited sample size, there was no difference in the three years between Commercial and Federal. The on-campus-recruiting interview process for both sides is handled on a national level and follow the procedures.

I don't know if the process is different for the S&O side, but I highly doubt it. And the offers may differ for experienced hires where the offers and salaries are a lot less standardized.

 

I also don't know about the Tech side, so I won't comment there, but I know for fact that recruiting for Federal and Commercial (S&O) are handled by completely different people/units. Also, commercial S&O and Federal S&O won't even recruit on the same campus (campuses are basically "claimed" by one or the other). For example, at Princeton, where S&O actually hires both commercial and Federal, only Federal is allowed on Campus. Commercial's recruiting is all virtual, and there is an automatic process that seperates the resumes for the two.

Again, the S&O salaries are different. The hiring processes are also different. Typically (and this can vary depending on the person), someone with an MBA starting in commercial starts as an SC with around a 120-130k salary (haven;t looked at this year's numbers). In Federal, they are now typically starting MBA's at the Consultant level, where they'll probably make in the 80's.

Again, as another poster mentioned, the Federal Arm and the Commercial arm are different, with different procedures and standards.

 

While I have no interest in Federal Consulting whatsoever, to say that PwC is greater than Deloitte or BAH is somewhat crazy. BAH is #9 on the top Federal Contractors list with revenues of ~$3.7B, Deloitte is #25 with revenues of ~1.2B, and PwC does not make the list (#100 had revenues of ~169M, so not even a tenth of Deloitte's federal revenues).

Best obviously does not necessarily equate to highest revenues, but in the Federal Space where the work options you have are all about existing, long term contracts, hard to say that PwC even competes with the other big guys.

 

Offers for full-time analysts to start this summer/fall in Commercial S&O at Deloitte were 72.5k base + 10k signing. Pretty sure Federal S&O starts at the same. Pay is standardized across the country and is the same in every city for starting S&O analysts. Analysts don't get year-end bonuses (although that might change soon), but you can get pretty hefty raises if you're a top performer (15-20% per year).

 

Federal is less. I've worked on both sides of one of the firms mentioned and I can confirm this. Maybe, just maybe kids from Princeton, GTown, etc. get paid on parity with their classmates in commercial, but a gap soon appears. By Sr. Consultant, pay gap could easily be 30-40K base.

That said, as post-military jobs go. Both firms are about the best you can do. Both have great transition programs, a ton of veterans, and flexibility with regard to reserve duty (if that was something you were considering). OP, feel free to send me a PM.

"Just go to the prom and get your promotion. That's the way the business world works. Come on, Keith!" - The Boss
 
The Boss:

Federal is less. I've worked on both sides of one of the firms mentioned and I can confirm this. Maybe, just maybe kids from Princeton, GTown, etc. get paid on parity with their classmates in commercial, but a gap soon appears. By Sr. Consultant, pay gap could easily be 30-40K base.

That said, as post-military jobs go. Both firms are about the best you can do. Both have great transition programs, a ton of veterans, and flexibility with regard to reserve duty (if that was something you were considering). OP, feel free to send me a PM.

So what is the current base for a S&O consultant in Federal? I thought they were paid the same as commercial.

 
The Boss:

Federal is less. I've worked on both sides of one of the firms mentioned and I can confirm this. Maybe, just maybe kids from Princeton, GTown, etc. get paid on parity with their classmates in commercial, but a gap soon appears. By Sr. Consultant, pay gap could easily be 30-40K base.

That said, as post-military jobs go. Both firms are about the best you can do. Both have great transition programs, a ton of veterans, and flexibility with regard to reserve duty (if that was something you were considering). OP, feel free to send me a PM.

He's correct, from what I've seen. A lot of Federal Consultants get paid less because they can't charge their client (the government) as much as the commercial practice can. I'm not sure the gap is as big as 30-40k by Sr. Consultant, but it definitely gets bigger as you go up the ladder. One thing that's different, though, is that an MBA is definitely not needed and most Federal consultants that I know don't have them, so they don't have to forgo the salary and pay for school, and get those 2 years to continue their progression through the firm.

 
The Sour Patch Kid:
The Boss:

Federal is less. I've worked on both sides of one of the firms mentioned and I can confirm this. Maybe, just maybe kids from Princeton, GTown, etc. get paid on parity with their classmates in commercial, but a gap soon appears. By Sr. Consultant, pay gap could easily be 30-40K base.

That said, as post-military jobs go. Both firms are about the best you can do. Both have great transition programs, a ton of veterans, and flexibility with regard to reserve duty (if that was something you were considering). OP, feel free to send me a PM.

He's correct, from what I've seen. A lot of Federal Consultants get paid less because they can't charge their client (the government) as much as the commercial practice can. I'm not sure the gap is as big as 30-40k by Sr. Consultant, but it definitely gets bigger as you go up the ladder. One thing that's different, though, is that an MBA is definitely not needed and most Federal consultants that I know don't have them, so they don't have to forgo the salary and pay for school, and get those 2 years to continue their progression through the firm.

Primary research/experience: Federal was 72.5k + 10k (72.5k and 12k for interns than signed on) this year. D. Consulting is one of the biggest players in the Federal arena. Those who blindly suggest that all or most federal consultants earn less than their commercial counterparts are mistaken.

Competing firms who have significantly smaller federal practices (under a billion) in fact do pay less in their federal practices but 1. not by much. 2. I recall if you're a top performer your bonus makes up for it.

No pain, no pain.
 

Et facilis dolor voluptatem tempora porro aliquam. Quae consectetur quisquam recusandae nesciunt aliquid. Aut est optio optio rerum. Omnis placeat deleniti eos voluptas necessitatibus et facilis.

Explicabo nihil veniam necessitatibus illo. Magni placeat possimus sed doloremque nam consequatur et. Cum in quibusdam perspiciatis fuga quia excepturi optio. Iusto sit aut occaecati repellat saepe a. Saepe voluptatibus necessitatibus accusamus rerum. Et explicabo nulla deleniti vel. Recusandae sed maxime a velit consectetur optio.

Et sapiente minima quo quis. Numquam perspiciatis asperiores sequi dolores maiores at. Qui exercitationem velit natus similique iure dolorem adipisci doloribus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • Cornerstone Research 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • McKinsey and Co 97.7%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Consulting

  • Bain & Company 99.4%
  • McKinsey and Co 98.9%
  • Boston Consulting Group (BCG) 98.3%
  • Oliver Wyman 97.7%
  • LEK Consulting 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Consulting

  • Partner (4) $368
  • Principal (25) $277
  • Director/MD (55) $270
  • Vice President (47) $246
  • Engagement Manager (100) $226
  • Manager (152) $170
  • 2nd Year Associate (158) $140
  • Senior Consultant (331) $130
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (108) $130
  • Consultant (587) $119
  • 1st Year Associate (538) $119
  • NA (15) $119
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (146) $115
  • Engineer (6) $114
  • 2nd Year Analyst (344) $103
  • Associate Consultant (166) $98
  • 1st Year Analyst (1048) $87
  • Intern/Summer Associate (188) $84
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (552) $67
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”