Griftopia - Matt Taibbi

Reading Griftopia, Matt Taibbi's latest book. It is awesome. I recommend it to everyone, especially those who are cynical about his writing and those who often side with the banks in the analysis of the financial crisis.

 

Just picked up this book and am half way through. I think it's phenomenal, Taibbi is an amazing writer. He completely rips Alan Greenspan a new one. How you can have any respect for Greenspan is beyond me. Interested to hear what others think about this. Probably not going to be very popular on here since it basically lays out how all the banks we want to work for are destroying the world. Time for a reality check because that's not that far from the truth.

 

One of the best, and most honest, books I've ever read. His stuff is great and anyone that denounces him as a "hater" or some such nonsense is either a blind shill, a troll, or a sociopath.

I also highly recommend reading through the Levin-Coburn report on the Crisis. Really incredible stuff on everything from WaMu, to the rating agencies, to regulatory failures, and Goldman Sachs / DB. Unbelievable stuff.

"But, but, your just jelly that Blankfein gets money" - typical troll reply to facts and reason with regards to an analysis of the financial crisis.

 

LIBOR,

Glad to hear it. Hope you find it as interesting as I did. There's a line in the book on Greenspan that might be my all-time favorite sentence ever put to paper. And the chapter on Healthcare reform is spectacular and approaches the issue with really great substance (as opposed to the usual death panels vs. 40M uninsured crap.)

 

I havent read this book so I won't comment on it, but from Taibbi's other writings I will say that anyone who buys into him is just as delusional as those who deny him outright. He is Michael Moore of the written word. He decides on a conclusion and finds facts that suit it. His most recent hack piece on Morgan Stanley was so desperately delusional I genuinely felt sorry for him as I read it.

His writing often reminds me of youtube videos of Maxine Waters. She is nothing short of full blown retarded, and possibly illiterate, but sure enough there is someone that will label her Financial Services committee participation as "grilling wall street executives" while the other 95% of America knows that she was making a fool of herself (to put it mildly).

PerhapsTaibbi has his moments, and maybe his message is well intended, but he generally only sells something the huffpo/RS crowd would buy.

 

The focus of that article is about how programs like TALF which were well-meaning were completely taken advantage of. If you're ok with John Mack's housewife setting up a company to profit off of TALF, then there's no point in continuing this discussion.

What really depresses me is that your user name is paying homage to perhaps the greatest scene in Seinfeld history.

Seriously though, point out a few examples as to how Taibbi is "delusional," rather than just making ad hominem attacks on the guy.

 
Best Response

How was it taken advantage of? Sounds like an investment in a fund completely unrelated to Morgan Stanley, using a spouse's name rather than the CEO of a bank which the pitchfork crowd (aka the poors, huffo readers, etc) would no doubt jump all over. I could parrot other retorts but Mr. Weinberg's seems just fine. http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/04/15/matt-taibbis-fact-souffle/

You will also notice I didn't discount Taibbi completely in my original post. Rather, I discounted both the complete acceptance of his viewpoints AND the complete rejection. I probably agree with a lot of his general thesis, if he presented them like a sane person in private and not like the hyperbolic lunatic his has to play in public (he is playing right?)

This was, after all, a journalist who wrote about fishing hats and bicyles for Men's Journal, and fine tuned his vitriol with an English-language Russian newspaper (wtf... http://dealbreaker.com/2010/02/horse-semen-scalding-hot-coffee-matt-tai… ...vanity fair link in there as well) , before the esteemed financial press of Rolling Stone gave him a platform.

 
Cartwright:
How was it taken advantage of? Sounds like an investment in a fund completely unrelated to Morgan Stanley, using a spouse's name rather than the CEO of a bank which the pitchfork crowd (aka the poors, huffo readers, etc) would no doubt jump all over. I could parrot other retorts but Mr. Weinberg's seems just fine. http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2011/04/15/matt-taibbis-fact-souffle/

You will also notice I didn't discount Taibbi completely in my original post. Rather, I discounted both the complete acceptance of his viewpoints AND the complete rejection. I probably agree with a lot of his general thesis, if he presented them like a sane person in private and not like the hyperbolic lunatic his has to play in public (he is playing right?)

This was, after all, a journalist who wrote about fishing hats and bicyles for Men's Journal, and fine tuned his vitriol with an English-language Russian newspaper (wtf... http://dealbreaker.com/2010/02/horse-semen-scalding-hot-coffee-matt-tai… ...vanity fair link in there as well) , before the esteemed financial press of Rolling Stone gave him a platform.

No point in debating this shit. I'm just sick and tired of arguing about it. I'll never understand the issue guys like you have with the fact that Taibbi calls someone an asshole as opposed to "Mr. Blankfein" and "Mr. Paulson" and shit like that. As though it detracts from the arguments made.

I'll conclude by saying the one thing that we can definitely agree on is that when the Chinese restaurant owner said "I did call your name, I said Cartwright" is a top 3 scene in Seinfeld history.

 

Natus necessitatibus neque maxime quis esse magnam. In ducimus fugiat blanditiis aliquid. Voluptatibus consectetur et et sed et cum ex maxime. Odit reprehenderit et eligendi earum est nam quia. Ab repellendus distinctio voluptatum architecto eius ipsa rerum. Et veniam qui corporis modi harum.

Temporibus ut nemo numquam accusamus non. Perferendis quae maxime consequatur commodi. Omnis omnis et ab voluptatibus asperiores.

Eligendi voluptatem dicta ipsa unde minima eos. Repellat laborum consequatur voluptatem et. Et ut ipsam nulla a error quia reiciendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”