Just have a decent GPA and you'll be fine (3.7 or 3.8 will work). It's a check the box thing normally and a bad one can hurt you when looking for a job but nobody has ever been hired anywhere strictly based on GPA.

i'm not sure if you're looking for advice on IB or PE or whatever, but networking and interviewing well will do more for you than an extra 0.1 on the GPA.

 

Cool, then I stand by what I said. At this point, you can't change it if you're already in banking so you have to roll with it either way. Don't spend you worrying about it, focus on what type of fund you want to go to (you'll come across better in interviews), preparing for interviews and networking to the extent that you can. Also, continue to do a good job at your current firm because people will call your superiors whether you put them as a reference or not (i'm saying this from the view of someone that gets a lot of those calls from old colleagues).

 

Have heard from buy-side alumni that when working with PE headhunters, regardless of fund size, GPA (and sometime ACT/SAT scores) not only improve your chances coming from a non-target, especially when looking to transition from Chicago to NY with 3.80/4.00 and ~1400/1600 being cutoffs. Many described that all you have for on-cycle buy-side recrutiment is trasaction experience, bank/group reputation, and academic metrics.

Array
 

This is helpful. Do you know specifically how PE HH's rank candidates? Say for example, 3-4 kids from top, comparable IB groups all graduated from the same target school. Would the separation between candidates at that point be based more on extracurriculars/leadership during school, or minor differences in GPA/scores? Just curious to hear your thoughts

 

I received quite a bit of advice to be prepared to explain exactly what you are looking for in terms of a private equity firm (size, focus, industry coverage, geography, etc.) when speaking with headhunters. This allegedly helps when firms are forced to boil down between two nearly identical candidates - often opting to extend an offer to the one a headhunter believes will likely accept. Rankings, while obviously a mystery, seem to boil down to first and foremost current bank/group and undergrad followed by a GPA and test score filter and lastly extracurriculars (often replaced with pertinent deal experience).

Array
 

To clarify, are you saying headhunters won’t work with you if you’re hoping to do PE in ny from Chicago if your gpa is below a 3.8? Or what exactly do you mean?

 

Alumni explained that a higher GPA is always better and that a ~3.8 is a comfortable for the buy-side recruitment process. Does not mean headhunters will refuse to work with you, especially coming from a reputable bank.

Array
 
Most Helpful

If you feel the need to quantify it, generally a 3.8+ is very good and a 3.9+ is excellent, depending on your major. You usually need to meet a certain threshold to get your foot in the door; however, I can honestly tell you that being able to articulate yourself and be a personable human is far more important. The kids who get the best offers (especially in IB) are the ones who have a high GPA but can also communicate better than anyone else.

Ultimately, you should focus on your intellectual passions and not worry so much about GPA. Aside from studying just pure business (like a lot of IB hardos), study something like math or philosophy to show you know how to think and solve problems analytically (this is the most employable skill). I promise you that having a unique intellectual edge matters a lot more than a number on your resume.

Kids who only care about their GPA and want to do IB just because it's IB are almost always boners. I've seen it time and again – these kids don't interview well. A stud with a 3.6 will fare much, much better than an absolute doinker with a perfect GPA.

 

Sit harum et ut consequatur et vel. Iste exercitationem voluptatem corporis tenetur inventore fugit. At ut mollitia ducimus beatae assumenda ipsam. Odit labore quisquam est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (89) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”