How to Read a Legal Doc Like a Champ

One part of the job that is often challenging (especially for new bankers) is reading legal docs - IOI, LOI or purchase agreement being the most likely you'll encounter. No one teaches you how to do it, and it is REALLY hard to learn. Below are some high impact / low effort ways to look real smart real fast.

Step 1. Precedents:

Get a contract from a deal that recently closed and use that as a reference (bonus points if you can get more contracts to compare against - bankers are ALWAYS running comps). Allows you a reference to determine what terms are "market". As you get more experience, you won't need to rely on other people's deals and can refer to your own.

Step 2. Run the following searches:

Days, months, years
Anything that has a time component, compare that to market. x number of days to provide notice for this, or y number of months in order to process that. Anything that varies from other contracts may be "off market".

Notes to Draft (NTDs), "[" and blanks
Anywhere there is a NTD or a "[" indicating a placeholder or a blank space usually means someone needs information to complete it. You will look like a hero if you can give some guidance for what is needed to get this closer to the finish line (+10 points if you can provide a VDR reference for the required DD item). See how past deals filled in those blanks and figure out what makes sense here. A perfect example is networking capital peg - see below.

Networking Capital Peg
This is a textbook area where the banker and accountants are expected to fill in the gaps (and potentially negotiate a position). As you get experienced, you will know which levers to pull. It also goes a long way if you know what positions buyers and sellers will take (and, academically, why), what market is, and what makes sense. Also, attention to detail. Don't just let people argue academically about what "should" happen or what is "market" but also know how much $ is impacted. A bunch of times I've told both buyers and sellers (both as clients and counter-parties) - this is a small amount of money: Stop wasting your time trying to just "win".

Materiality Thresholds
Disclosure schedules will be governed by materiality thresholds. For example, buyer will likely want to see as many contracts as possible. Depending on the business, to give 100% of the contracts will likely be onerous and prohibatively difficult. So you'll set a threshold that says you will give all contracts above a certain amount. This is usually a significant number that allows all the contracts fitting in the threshold to represent a significant amount of revenue: 60%, 80%, 90% - whatever makes sense in the context of your deal. For example: seller may have 1,000 clients (long tail - lots of small clients), a materiality threshold of $10M represents the top 100 clients and 90% of revenue; $20M represents the top 50 clients and 80% of revenue; $50M represents top 10 clients and 60% of revenue. Knowing the thresholds, number of clients, percentages and being able to give advice on this matter is gold and totally doable for a motivated junior banker.

Hope this helps. Go get 'em.

 

U da man! Legal docs are by far the biggest pain point for me as an analyst.

 
Most Helpful

Awesome post. Will add for the corporate bankers reading this that everything here applies to credit agreements as well. Look at covenants, conditions prior to closing, security, pricing, contractual terms, and compare with historic/industry peer credit agreements.

STONKS
 

Placeat eum explicabo et hic et et accusamus aut. Ipsam debitis similique illum est earum veniam sint minus. Et fugit totam quo sit rerum dolorem. Quia magni quas architecto cum voluptates reiciendis. Eum sit voluptas est sapiente sed. Ea non veniam et similique.

Sunt doloremque in rerum sapiente. Et explicabo eum aliquam deleniti assumenda. Beatae animi aperiam nemo sed.

Consequatur ea et quisquam corporis excepturi placeat. Suscipit animi in debitis exercitationem porro maiores. Et vel cumque laudantium corrupti. Dolorem aliquam nulla aliquid consequatur maxime dolore. Dicta nemo culpa cum aut in. Cum sed fuga quis laborum.

Itaque libero accusantium maxime earum consequatur. Amet optio odit impedit illum cupiditate id laudantium. Dolorem ipsam officiis in dolor aperiam mollitia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”