Investing Question

Not sure how many of you are familiar with this website, but I just came across this: https://www.tipranks.com/analysts/top?llf=sub-hea…

Basically, it ranks ER analysts on the percentage of stock recommendations they get right and the average percentage gain per winner. The top guys have around an 80% win rate and like 35% average gain per winner (annual). So my question is, would it be a viable portfolio strategy to just follow one of these analysts to a T and do the exact thing that they recommend? Most of them have like hundreds of picks so you'd have no problem with diversification, and when accounting for losers that ends up at like 25% ROI, not to mention each one has several 100+% jackpots. Obviously the average person isn't smart enough to pick stocks and is better off investing in SPY or something, so why not just follow one of these guys to take all of the work out of it? I get that if their track record is limited to like 2 years you can't put too much weight in their success, but if you have a guy who has consistently produced winners for 10+ years, I'm failing to see any real possible downsides (which is why I'd love to hear your thoughts).

 
Most Helpful

I'm not going to answer the question directly right away, I'll just tell you what's off base with your thinking. with the exception of 2 or 3, all of the analysts are technology analysts which has been the single best performing sector in the market. the question you should be asking is not "do these analysts pick stocks that go up" but "if I follow an analyst-picked portfolio, will I outperform their sector over multiple market cycles?" and that information is not given. I'd like to stack up these analysts against IVW (not a recommendation) and see what their performance is comparatively. that's #1, are you asking the right question (so far, no)? btw, IVW is up >36% as I write, so about average with the analysts' average picks.

#2, what are the drivers of analyst success? could there be another factor at play? for example, I believe technology stocks have benefitted from a momentum trade recently (look up AQR/research affiliates papers on factor based investing for more on this) and that it might not be analyst skill, it might just be that they happen to be in a honey hole sector. AMOM is up >40% this year, better than analysts, all it's doing is picking what's done better recently. So #2 is ensuring you're actually isolating the analyst's skill, and not other factors (of which there could be many).

#3, finally cognitive biases. how long of a career have these analysts had? are they simply beneficiaries of survivorship bias, selection bias, or hot hand fallacy? have their picks outperformed throughout multiple market cycles, or do they just look good during bull markets?

in short, I think this is a foolish idea. you would essentially be concentrating your entire portfolio in technology stocks and have similar performance with just buying a tech sector ETF or figuring out what factor benefitted tech the most (hint, it's momentum) recently. I'd also argue that this method would save in costs because you're not constantly having to alter your positions, you're buying a broad based ETF, mutual fund, or static stock portfolio and just giving it time to grow. 

 

Qui aut beatae autem repudiandae. Debitis ut repellat recusandae adipisci laborum. Officiis rem sed voluptas sit nisi dolor ipsum earum.

Et a sed mollitia consequatur unde deserunt molestiae. Ad omnis odio et exercitationem id inventore. Voluptatem repellendus rerum sed nisi. Delectus nihil consectetur exercitationem architecto voluptates.

Veniam modi et maxime et. At qui voluptatem ducimus id alias id dolores. Magni officiis labore minus reiciendis sapiente temporibus. Dolor incidunt culpa ipsam accusantium laboriosam libero unde. Qui cumque asperiores ipsum aut quidem voluptatem aut.

Consequatur reprehenderit in aut rerum et. Sint ab et qui et quis asperiores. Consequatur veniam quia voluptas. Eligendi recusandae voluptas repudiandae eveniet explicabo ullam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (20) $385
  • Associates (88) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (67) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”