2020 Incoming Analyst here:
Recently heard some horror stories on junior front office IBD/M&A staff treatment and firings at JPM in London. Seems a few ppl were chopped only a few weeks right after they hit their desks at the firm. Others were relocated to mid-office/bad teams without being told in advance.
Anyone knows more about this? Which teams were involved? And why? Thought they were still doing well?
| +152 | How to stop feeling like shit for not making it in IB? | 57 | 47m | |
| +115 | If Tik Tok is forced to sell, what banks do you think would be involved in the deal? | 58 | 24m | |
| +80 | Updated LA Banking Scene (2024) | 57 | 20m | |
| +38 | Ranking banks that went under | 20 | 8h | |
| +34 | Burnt Out M&A ASO | 18 | 3h | |
| +32 | A strategy for SA applicants late to the game like myself | 15 | 12h | |
| +29 | Relevance of A-Levels for U.K. London recruiting | 21 | 19h | |
| +26 | Series 79 Help / Tips to Pass The First Attempt | 11 | 2d | |
| +26 | Intern Ettiquette | 4 | 16h | |
| +23 | What are hours like at BBs in London? | 47 | 14h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
They are doing well, but last year's intern class (also this one) has been extremely bad, which has lead to having some full time hires that were absolutely crap, that has influenced a lot how they have been treated, being moved or cut off.
If you do show some kind of commitment don't be worried, nothing structural at all.
I find this funny. 1000 applicants for each spot and the analysts that get the roles are crap?
From my personal experience, yes. hahaha
I am at JPM London and can confirm this
It happens when you hire 80 people per class and rather than focusing on the quality of the candidates you focus on gender, sexual preferences, race, etc
How can JPM judge on commitment and future performance of freshmen who will only be with the firm for a few weeks by then? Don‘t they need at least 3-12 months to get some profound impressions from everyone’s job first?
Further advic needed, pls help!
Advise is a verb, advice is a noun
Absolutely not. You can usually tell in the first month whether someone will work out or not. If they're not fully ramped up at three months I prefer to fire them. They just aren't cut out for the job.
LOL at the poor snowflake that MS'd me. Your thoughts here matter about as much as they do in the professional world, that is to say, not at all.
No insight into recent events, yet JPM was known to be a shop with much much more people per team compared to other banks. They are surely adjusting to the real level of staff required.
Does this mean new joiners will still be at a higher risk than people who are at the firm for years already?
Join Real Estate if given the chance, their high deal flow will be helpful to survive. Its a jump to safety movement.
I don't want to sound arrogant or anything, but pretty much everything that has been said above, including by the original poster is not accurate.
JPM has laid off between 40 to 70 people (depending on who you speak to) across Analysts and Associates. Accordingly to people on the floor, pretty much 3-5 people per team in Corporate Finance (i.e. not in ECM, ALF, DCM) have been asked to leave / relocate to other businesses within two months.
As JPM in London has C&R, DI, TMT, FIG, NRG, HC, Cazenove, Nordics, Benelux, Real Estate, Infra, assuming the 3-5 number above is accurate, they let go between 30 and 55 people. As a fact, they let go people at associate 1 and associate 2 level, hence they didn't specifically target new joiners. On the contrary, they cut some people who were lateral hires that spent 1 year with the firms, but they didn't cut the lateral hires they got this summer, despite cutting other people within those groups.
Secondly, different people got different treatments: if you were a decent performer, you received 2 months of notice, and you could use the first month to find another job within the firm (eg. in Capital Markets which is growing). If you were not a good performer, you were asked to leave without the option to recruit internally.
Going to the reasons of this, JPM just became the best bank on the street (together with GS but for different reasons) in which you want to be an analyst:
- marvelous platform, scale, brand name and experience
- one of the the few which still have the training in NY
- voluntary rotation program after 18 months in other groups
- voluntary global mobile program to change office between your third and sixth year
- pen down policy between Friday evening and Saturday afternoon
- protected weekend initiative
- no marketing work on weekends
- fast track promotions at analyst / associate and VP level
- senior people becoming more conscious of work life balance at junior level with terrible MD which were asked to leave in the last few years / not properly compensated as a result of poor performance with juniors
All of the above, determined a much lower churn that what JPM was expecting (I know multiple people at analysts level who just don't want to recruit for PE as lifestyle is simply good, including analyst 2/3 leaving consistently between 7 and 9 pm unless they are on live mandates) and they ended up with too many people with transaction volume this year not being as strong as last year (as a result of the market more than JPM)
I didn't think you were arrogang the first, second or third time... but a fourth? Come one. That's just rubbing it in his face!
EDIT: Lol, seems like the other three identical posts were removed due to spam.
Completely inaccurate. And I can say this as JPM banker
I have friends that got fired at associate 1, associate 2 or Analyst in NRG, TMT and DI. Some of them are recruiting internally, some of them got asked to leave. You can tell me what is inaccurate and we can exchange notes. I have been there 5 years and live with one of them who is in his 7th year there, so I would think my sources are pretty accurate
One thing I didn’t mention, aligned to the OP, one guy who rotated from NA and who was supposed to sit in an industry group, got allocated to private placements, within ECM. Given this, I would not exclude they may have done something similar with new joiners.
To be honest, in 5 years with them, I have never seen something like this.
The problem started here:
JPM London was #1 in the recent years by the percentage of the people that get summer internship through connections. Not "push my CV up" sort of networking during the selection who gets the phone interview (first big cut in the selection process) but "I have lower 2:1, don't know what is market beta and no motivation but dad told me it would be the best to start my career here so he called senior bankers to lobby for me" sort of connection.
It worked well 5-6 years ago because the guys that had connections were motivated.
Than consider the usual contingent that comes every year through diversity programme and not qualifications (female, African-Americans, LGBT etc.) and it is clear that the serious problem will arise.
Luckily for them no one care whether you have higher or lower 2.1
Tbf grades mean shit - some of the best analysts had shit grades because they can’t give a fuck about academic shit but have insane attention to detail + solid technical skills.
I get you are against diversity programs but what does African American have to do with JPM London ...
Not African American in that sense, I talked about black students born and raised in the UK that receive an offer only because of the diversity programme.
If only qualifications would be considered in deciding who receives the offer for IB internship/FT, 95% of the intake would be white, male, straight and Western European. That is the fact.
Where do you get this ranking from? It is not my experience there to be honest. I saw a lot of girls but not many black individuals. And as a matter of fact, you don’t know the sexual orientation of the candidate as you go through the interview process.
OP here: This is all helpful. It very much sounds like a shit place you should not start your finance career in (considered you are a strong performer but mainstream, West European, white, male, and straight). Also, it sounds like there is just too much of nepotism going on.
How about the more junior, good mainstream people who deliver on day-to-day work and don’t care for politics? Do they still exist? What happens to them?
I think your stories will help many ongoing finance people (even those who still seriously consider M&A)...
Unfortunately there is politics in every finance organization. After few years in the sector, you eventually accept it. It sucks, but it is still there and to be consistently well ranked, especially as you move up with seniority, you need to play it and be lucky at it. I have been on both side (i.e. taking advantage of that and being disadvantaged because of that), and it is frustrating when you have it against you but we need to recognize that sometimes you have it on your side. There are people who do their job and don’t care about this stuff, but eventually you have to. Banking is a people job and after a certain level, your technical skills are given for granted and then it becomes all about your ability to blend with the seniors and the clients and this has a lot to do with politics.
Est consequatur autem error ex distinctio autem repellendus. Aut illo recusandae placeat voluptatem minima quam quia. Facilis aperiam asperiores quo sint.
Dolores distinctio mollitia placeat et dolores ipsam. Id laudantium odio dolores ducimus nemo id velit. Amet accusantium repellendus deserunt error. Et atque dolorem perspiciatis corrupti. Ducimus vel sapiente qui alias cumque et. Delectus omnis est aut id.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et aspernatur ipsum quae ab veritatis quaerat. Cum nihil dolorem eos est ut minus reprehenderit. Natus ullam et eius veniam doloremque nemo. Quisquam exercitationem nostrum delectus quidem unde. Amet quos autem saepe rerum maiores quam quos. Voluptatem ut nulla sed tempore quos.
Pariatur rerum repellendus itaque dolorem omnis est ut dolorem. Soluta ipsum blanditiis dolore et eligendi quod. Quod suscipit aut facilis. Fugiat laboriosam quidem fuga molestiae nulla mollitia molestiae. Atque tempore odio eaque atque voluptatum minus.