LSE vs LBS

I have been accepted in the MSc Finance at LSE and the MFA at LBS. Which one should I attend? I want to secure a SA position for the next summer at a top BB, but I only have one internship in M&A at a big 4 and a spring internship at a large French BB. Which of these two provides me the greatest chances to achieve this goal? I have heard that LSE’s program is more competitive so I am feeling inclined to LSE. Any thoughts?

64 Comments
 

What makes you feel so sure about it? I’ve been told that LSE’s entrance standards are higher than LBS’s and LSE’s placement is marginally better than MFA’s

 
Controversial

Brand name: LBS > LSE LBS got private networking class probably the best carrier team and at LSE you are competing with undergraduates. All banks have headcount and competiton is higher at LSE.

Think it depends a lot on yourself, but for me LBS is better without hesidation.

 

It’s interesting that you mention that point, because when I look at previous year’s employment reports LSE’s MSc Finance looks better. So not sure I can rely on that reasoning

 

Then go pick LSE hahah. I am just saying just because you got LSE/LBS master won't mean that you will get a SA, its all up to yourself. Having only a big 4 internship is average imo.

 

Personally, I believe that the value added of a Masters programme is the professional opportunities it opens, not the education. So from what you told me, it would make more sense to go LBS. However, I feel that the brand name of LSE's MSc Finance looks better on your CV than MFA's (probably because it is newer)? Would you agree?

 

LSE is the more established institution and definitely have more alumni around the city, since it has always converted multiple undergrads going to work straight in the city. However, as mentioned above LBS is more exclusive as it offers only MSc's and MBA's. Therefore, on paper you should be able get a better response rate and build some meaningful connections. One other thing which can be overlooked is the broader quality of the people who graduate. Sure, LSE have rigorous entry standards, however the number of people attending it are definitely much more and a lot of 18/19 old kids, would just figure out that they want something else. LBS on the other hand gets applicants who already have done their BSc and graduated with at least a solid 2:1, and have done GMAT/CFA and for post-experience courses/MBA's have solid experiences. Hence, you would contact/meet people who already established what they want.

I think LBS are doing a lot of career workshops, events, guest talks which help shape your overall skills and knowledge and justify the 35K fee. However, strictly for entering banking LSE is probably still the place to go. In either case, both programmes should get your foot in the interview room.

P.S do you mind sharing what was your GMAT and when did you apply to LSE and after how much time they've sent you the offer (as their website does not provide such info). Thanks and best of luck!

 

Indeed, that is one of the points in favor of LBS. LSE has much larger number of applicants towards banking. Do you think that MSc Finance students have an edge in comparison to undergraduates? I would like to go to IB or a PE but have been told that for PE, probably LBS is the best place due to its close network. Any idea on this?

Sure! Portuguese; GMAT: 700; top of class from one of the best unis in Portugal; LSE's response took approximately 3 weeks

 

Depends on your undergrad. If you already done one in Finance, the MSc will probably not make a big difference. However, the institution where you do it, will matter. If I am to do an undergrad in finance at a non-target and just do a MSc in finance at the same place, simply because it is the easiest thing to do, not much will change. Doing CFA lvl 1 will give you the same knowledge as the LBS/LSE modules (not the same leg in recruitment, hence why you pay 35K). Again, brand and reputation.

P.S Do you mind sharing when did you sent you application to LSE?

 

I partially agree with your answer. LBS programme begins in mid-August while LSE only in the beginning of September. However, all the important LSE exams are on the last term (April-June) and there are almost no group projects in the first term (September-December) while LBS has some group projects/exams in the first term. What time (months) do you think it’s the most chaotic in terms of recruitment?

 

The program at LBS is structured to be lighter in the recruitment period, plus the LBS team prepares you in advance of recruiting for what to expect. It is a more practical and careers focused program, whereas LSE is more academic in nature. Really can’t go wrong with either choice, but the program with LSE would be more intensive during the recruitment period I believe. You should look into the culture at both schools too and whether students at both schools are more collaborative or competitive with regards to helping each other out in recruiting.

 

Yes, I did. From all the feedback that I got, it seems the MFA and MiF at LSE are similar. in terms of image for potential recruiters, I think that attending the MFA with a scholarship has greater value than LSE without scholarship

 

Asperiores fugiat ad quas id eos molestiae tempora. At consequuntur minus assumenda voluptates suscipit reprehenderit. Consequatur eum quod sint unde inventore voluptatem eligendi. Hic rerum quia ipsum molestiae. Quo ratione provident accusantium quidem provident fugit possimus.

Et illum debitis earum velit qui. Fugit quia quibusdam quibusdam. Iure eum vel nobis id minima sequi. Possimus non natus maiores.

Consequatur sed nulla modi quas quod qui repellat. Aut quae ipsa excepturi voluptates dolorem nemo. Error aspernatur nesciunt quos ipsa non animi voluptate. Labore rerum voluptatem eaque sed et. Nisi quo iste velit et nesciunt quod est. Iusto est non adipisci similique.

Reiciendis itaque ex velit sint eius quo. Et quidem magnam perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”