Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +89 | [2026 - October] Unbiased Prestige Rankings | 55 | 1h |
| +87 | Who is the final boss in Houston Energy? (GS, JEFF or EVR) | 19 | 20h |
| +78 | You should probably leave IB | 26 | 1d |
| +45 | Why Do We Turn Comments? | 10 | 1d |
| +43 | Tomorrow Will Be Better | 5 | 4d |
| +41 | Moelis PCA vs Lower tier BB Coverage | 30 | 1d |
| +25 | Banking (Un)fortunately Still Needs You: My Case for Bankers in the AI Era | 3 | 1d |
| +24 | How much should you ask questions / seek feedback as an intern? | 9 | 6h |
| +24 | UBS IB #24 in US M&A in 2026 | 10 | 3h |
| +23 | Lateraling as Analyst | 21 | 3h |
Career Resources
I suppose that depends on the person reviewing the resumes
Definitely doesn't show attention to detail.
Maybe. Maybe not. Don’t hurt yourself with the what-if game and just ensure that your next submission doesn’t have errors.
Probably not, I doubt they'll even see it depending on where it is and if you have good experience, normally people won't ding you for a period. Trust me, most analysts and associates do worse while even on the job.
I've done resume screening a ton as a 2-3 year analyst and during my associate years as well. In a pile of 100-200 resumes, I doubt that person will even find that extra period. Personally, I wouldn't ding someone for that.
Voluptatibus fugit beatae voluptatem laborum accusantium similique. Illum dicta ut laboriosam vel nemo officia ut. Nemo aut ipsa et velit aliquid et voluptatum beatae. Quidem reiciendis quis perferendis et eum quibusdam et. Et dolorem nisi molestiae quae mollitia delectus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...