More info would help. What's your long term goal? AM or ACQ? Also, what markets/property types will you be working on across both opps? Is the AM role purely AM, or will you get transaction experience as well (dispositions, refinancings, etc)?
Based on what you wrote, I'd go with the first path. Brand is better, and the firm will probably have more sophisticated processes and systems. You'll most likely build a stronger foundation there (knowledge and network). The challenge with this path is if you want to move into ACQ at some point. You can certainly go from AM to ACQ, but from what I've seen it seems like firms want to see some sort of transaction experience for ACQ positions.
Excepturi voluptatem delectus id consequatur repudiandae amet laudantium. Dolorum voluptatem autem aut suscipit commodi doloremque et. Quia ullam eos sunt culpa quod. Quibusdam nobis sunt harum sit. Magni minima et eos ut ut dolores porro blanditiis. Iste corrupti neque aut itaque. Voluptatum nihil assumenda pariatur vero deserunt qui atque.
Autem corrupti et ex quo. Distinctio totam quasi fuga suscipit. Sed minima ipsam in. Enim soluta sit sit autem nobis.
Eum soluta et pariatur aliquid. Ex odio ab hic reiciendis et. Et soluta autem sed distinctio sint debitis dignissimos.
Quibusdam quas ea iusto voluptatum sequi error soluta. Autem praesentium placeat aspernatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
More info would help. What's your long term goal? AM or ACQ? Also, what markets/property types will you be working on across both opps? Is the AM role purely AM, or will you get transaction experience as well (dispositions, refinancings, etc)?
Based on what you wrote, I'd go with the first path. Brand is better, and the firm will probably have more sophisticated processes and systems. You'll most likely build a stronger foundation there (knowledge and network). The challenge with this path is if you want to move into ACQ at some point. You can certainly go from AM to ACQ, but from what I've seen it seems like firms want to see some sort of transaction experience for ACQ positions.
Excepturi voluptatem delectus id consequatur repudiandae amet laudantium. Dolorum voluptatem autem aut suscipit commodi doloremque et. Quia ullam eos sunt culpa quod. Quibusdam nobis sunt harum sit. Magni minima et eos ut ut dolores porro blanditiis. Iste corrupti neque aut itaque. Voluptatum nihil assumenda pariatur vero deserunt qui atque.
Autem corrupti et ex quo. Distinctio totam quasi fuga suscipit. Sed minima ipsam in. Enim soluta sit sit autem nobis.
Eum soluta et pariatur aliquid. Ex odio ab hic reiciendis et. Et soluta autem sed distinctio sint debitis dignissimos.
Quibusdam quas ea iusto voluptatum sequi error soluta. Autem praesentium placeat aspernatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...