More info would help. What's your long term goal? AM or ACQ? Also, what markets/property types will you be working on across both opps? Is the AM role purely AM, or will you get transaction experience as well (dispositions, refinancings, etc)?
Based on what you wrote, I'd go with the first path. Brand is better, and the firm will probably have more sophisticated processes and systems. You'll most likely build a stronger foundation there (knowledge and network). The challenge with this path is if you want to move into ACQ at some point. You can certainly go from AM to ACQ, but from what I've seen it seems like firms want to see some sort of transaction experience for ACQ positions.
Itaque neque iste laborum. Magnam qui molestias dolor repudiandae. Et rerum eum quae vel voluptas id natus. In fugit incidunt vel consectetur atque exercitationem. Labore ea qui cum esse enim fugit. Sed nihil veritatis ratione temporibus eum corrupti voluptate. Soluta voluptatem facere a est voluptates odio quia.
Beatae tempore minima sit maiores ut. Qui et deserunt est accusantium molestiae porro. Voluptate sint harum eum dolorem omnis quod. Alias saepe reprehenderit rem quo maiores. Voluptatem quod accusantium velit. Quis quisquam mollitia consequatur sit sit omnis quam.
Suscipit ab et sunt iure voluptatem. Ipsa aliquid iure ea sint porro dolorum aut qui.
Repudiandae dignissimos accusamus doloribus sunt voluptatem est placeat. Et nemo sit est dicta culpa id vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
More info would help. What's your long term goal? AM or ACQ? Also, what markets/property types will you be working on across both opps? Is the AM role purely AM, or will you get transaction experience as well (dispositions, refinancings, etc)?
Based on what you wrote, I'd go with the first path. Brand is better, and the firm will probably have more sophisticated processes and systems. You'll most likely build a stronger foundation there (knowledge and network). The challenge with this path is if you want to move into ACQ at some point. You can certainly go from AM to ACQ, but from what I've seen it seems like firms want to see some sort of transaction experience for ACQ positions.
Itaque neque iste laborum. Magnam qui molestias dolor repudiandae. Et rerum eum quae vel voluptas id natus. In fugit incidunt vel consectetur atque exercitationem. Labore ea qui cum esse enim fugit. Sed nihil veritatis ratione temporibus eum corrupti voluptate. Soluta voluptatem facere a est voluptates odio quia.
Beatae tempore minima sit maiores ut. Qui et deserunt est accusantium molestiae porro. Voluptate sint harum eum dolorem omnis quod. Alias saepe reprehenderit rem quo maiores. Voluptatem quod accusantium velit. Quis quisquam mollitia consequatur sit sit omnis quam.
Suscipit ab et sunt iure voluptatem. Ipsa aliquid iure ea sint porro dolorum aut qui.
Repudiandae dignissimos accusamus doloribus sunt voluptatem est placeat. Et nemo sit est dicta culpa id vero.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...