http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-09/sec-set-to-lift-80-year-old-ba…
Thoughts on how this will affect the industry? What do you think really compelled the SEC to make this move, from their perspective?
Trending Content - Hedge Fund Forum
| +21 | 3x SWE FAANG Intern -> Fundamental Analyst @ HF | 11 | 1h |
| +9 | PM is a dumbass | 5 | 5d |
| +5 | Fund 1 8%, fund 2 5%, when will fund implode? | 4 | 8h |
| +3 | Castle Hook Partners | 0 | 5d |
| +3 | Disclosed non public fund performance to a headhunter | 2 | 4d |
| +3 | Dragoneer | 1 | 16h |
Career Resources
I think this is a good idea, not only for HF's but for the average investor. Over the long run private investment advertising will create more exposure and notoriety for HF's, but the public will be forced to do a little research in order to better understand how alternative investment vehicles work.
Side note:
IMO, I think that independent FoHF's will greatly benefit form this ruling since they allow the average investor access to funds that are otherwise inaccessible; therefore these firms could tailor specific ad campaigns towards these types of investor and potentially form large pools seed capital.
Consequatur et quibusdam explicabo nostrum laudantium numquam et. Ipsam nostrum dolores esse voluptas. Dolorum praesentium optio minima dolor rerum ipsam commodi ipsum.
Excepturi nam dolor culpa sit ea laboriosam. Doloribus numquam aut qui corrupti consequatur fugit quos. Sed sequi voluptatem cumque ipsa. Distinctio perspiciatis vel expedita quas corporis nesciunt.
Autem adipisci optio fugit ut delectus quo. Sit saepe ipsa eos quas perspiciatis quaerat. Veritatis error dolorem doloribus. Dolores aut aut eaque et est earum provident.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...