Transitioning from High-Yield/Performing Credit to Distressed HF

Questions for you opportunistic credit HF folks - How possible would it be for one to transition from a L/S HY ( including some stressed, CDS and LevLoans)/Performing Credit role to a distressed role? Assuming the former role is straight from undergrad, what extra steps would one need to take in order to be a competitive candidate for a public distressed seat at a top fund? What kind of difficulties or disadvantages might one face without having the IBD background and how would you compare to a LevFin/Rx Analyst?

I'm assuming more effort would have to be put towards modeling early on, but I'm not aware how of how drastic the difference in investment analysis is when comparing HY vs distressed credits and what disadvantages I might face. All opinions and additional info is appreciated from those sitting in either seat!

 
Most Helpful

I don't think its really a matter of modeling skills, so much so I'd say kinda an after thought from my perspective.

Overall, I think its an uphill battle for a lot of reasons. The main difference would be that while similar, the two jobs are very different (research process, building positions, driving process, post reorg, technical aspects etc). It's hard to answer specifically because there are a lot of nuances involved - what level are you, what level is open role, etc. For a more experience hire role, you'll be competing against people with distressed backgrounds so all things being equal they will win every time. If its more junior, maybe you're competing against a rx banker kid - who will have process know how over you but lacking direct investing experience. This situation has greater possibilities to win in my view. That said this stuff is all out of your control though so kinda is what it is.

In order to better prepare yourself you can 1) try to get involved with as many of the distressed situations in your current seat, 2) spent more time on credit docs for your current role, 2b) get up to speed on topical issues involving distressed situations that involved credit docs, 3) practice some distressed case studies, 4) get up to speed on the distressed process.

My gut is a successful transition will be more networking driven.

 

Thanks for this response, super helpful. I figured being in a buy-side seat would help my case, obviously analyzing and investing in HY/stressed credits in comparison to a SS seat, but will obviously have a few more roadblocks to get around. Also would be targeting more junior roles since this is only 2-ish yrs post undergrad. If this process is more networking driven, I'm assuming its definitely a very possible move. Definitely will apply your advice in those last 4 points.

 

Given you're more jr. I think the odds are a lot better. Craft a good story on why transition - should be pretty easy (I've worked on these stressed scenarios, blah blah blah). Pick up on lingo of distressed vs. HY. Less RV talk and spread talk, more total return, creation multiple (use interest to pay down multiple), priming, etc. Networking will help but at these levels so will a HH. If I was interviewing and it was between a jr level HY Analyst and an RX banker but that HY kid could talk credit really well, I'd be inclined to pick the HY kid because he/she has actually invested. I'd guess a lot will come down to preference but that's outside your control.

 

Great response above. I will add that the process knowledge that a restructuring banker has is not rocket science, and can be learned independently. Tons of resources are available to help you get up to speed on this (the commonly cited books, Distressed Debt Investing blog, and Reorg Research if your firm has a subscription).

So, self study plus a well-constructed pitch plus some networking can get you there. As said above, the earlier you make the transition the better. I also know of a case where a mid-level (5-6 years of experience) person was able to move into a startup distressed fund. It's doable.

 

Bumping this- And thanks again to the commenters above. Super helpful information. Another question that came to mind is if there are any inherent downsides to staying in high-yield/performing credit investing as opposed to switching to distressed? Is there any material difference in lifestyle & comp at the more senior levels? I get the idea that HY might be less sexy/lower comp only since the target return is a bit lower. But other than that, what reasons might one prefer to stay in HY, aside from the risk profile of its position in the capstack and possibly less investment scenarios including reorg/turn-arounds/etc. Thanks in advance.

 

Lifestyle for an MD at a top credit fund is pretty nice. Basically a 9-6 PM job Mon-Thurs, and much less than that on Fridays (with basically no Fridays during the summer, haha).

For a number of reasons, active management in the HY/Leveraged Loan works much better than it does in equities. I don't want to go through all of those reasons here, but there is a lot of publicly available information on the topic.

Combine the lifestyle with the fact that you are actively providing value to your investors makes being a performing credit investment professional (with the caveat that it should be at a good shop) pretty attractive.

 

Recusandae sit ipsum veritatis voluptas. Omnis dignissimos eius alias ea necessitatibus ut at minima. Assumenda explicabo dignissimos sed necessitatibus eaque cupiditate rerum.

Et aut reiciendis natus fugit minus quaerat eius. Nesciunt perspiciatis porro architecto veritatis rerum enim. Nesciunt ut sit voluptatem. Ad quam aut sed consequatur aliquam.

Eum velit quia non error molestias id. Vel optio incidunt asperiores sint quam pariatur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”