Which offer to choose for fulltime: Ardea Partners, BDA Partners, DBO Partners, FT Partners, or JPM Corporate Banking??? URGENT

Hi is anyone familiar with the above banks that could advise me on which offer to take if I want to exit into PE after a few years? I'm interested in tech space but it seems like aside from JPM, FT Partners is the most well-known (and most notorious?) firm I have to choose from? Their exits also seem pretty good despite being a boutique as I see ppl have left for Vista, Parthenon Capital, Accel, and Coatue. Ardea seems intriguing as well as all the senior guys come from GS and most members of the firm did stints on the buyside before going back into advisory business, but the focus is on FIG so I would probably only be on the peripherals of tech through fintech businesses they advise?

 

Imo: Ardea>FT Partners>JPM Corporate banking (transfer internally if you are a top performer after 1-3 years to IB)>BDA Partners (they are mostly active in Asia I don't see what you'd do as a junior sitting in the London office)>DBO Partners (haven't heard of them)

From Ardea you should be able to move quite easily to a good BB/EB after a year or so, maybe also from FT partners although your deal experience will be very niche.

 

Helpful, but would these rankings change for roles in US? Will be in NYC for all but DBO Partners. Also anyway to go from one of these direct to PE as opposed to having to lateral first?

 

I'd do JPM just because keeps the most doors open for the long term. Also, are any these guys still recruiting? I'm still trying to find a ft 2020 role

 

Ardea Partners have been doing quite well since their inception. They've done like $45bn in under 5 years with a team of 30-40. The work touches (fin)tech at times, e.g. ETRADE - Morgan Stanley. The overall quality of deal flow is arguably a tier above FT.

The flip side is that there are few past analyst exits to compare to since they're quite new and that there seem to be very few analysts at the firm, with the majority of junior members being associates.

Can't speak to the others too much, but just felt that Ardea was a bit undervalued in above comments. (I'm not an Ardea employee)

 

Isn't DBO a spin-out from a couple MS senior bankers? They seem to advise on a bunch of Silverlake's deals. I would consider there but defer to others more knowledgable.

Edit: Looked at the founding partners and they were all heads of West Region Sponsors at MS's SF office, which possibly seems in line with your PE goals, but maybe's a risk because this is a "start-up" investment bank.

 

There’s a reason most of them came from their PE buyside exits after GS FIG back to Ardea. Chris Cole and the other senior partners have extensive and deep connections which results in fantastic dealflow relative to their size. The compensation structure is quite unique in that you get a cut of the overall firm P&L (everyone at the firm does) and so in good years the comp for analysts has been beyond what you would make at any MF PE associate role. I’m not kidding, over $300k for analysts in prior years. BUT if you want to move to PE do not go there. Ardea has a fantastic pedigree but don’t go there if you want to just leave to the buyside - this won’t serve your purpose. I’m surprised they’re even hiring new grads. They’ve only taken experienced hires up to this point.

 

I was wondering if you can expand on this - why Ardea wouldn't be a 'pathway' to PE. In theory, if the OP joins a top-heavy boutique IB with a lot of pedigree and is doing well, wouldn't he/she gain significant exposure that would make them an attractive candidate for PE? I can understand say the firm not being 'supportive' of them leaving vs. some other IBs where the IB>PE path is so common place they almost expect you to leave in 2 years. But doesn't that just mean the OP just needs to go through recruiting on the DL or maybe a bit more reaching out to recruiters directly? As for recognition - I'm not up-to-date on the latest in IB land, but all it took was a quick google search and skim of bios to see that Ardea is quite stacked at the leadership level to see there's legitimacy. Presumably recruiters in the space would be aware of this too.

Just want to see if I missed anything in terms of challenges OP would face if they went there. Ardea sounds like a good and unique opportunity to scale up responsibilities at the analyst level.

 

No you make a good point. They could certainly go to PE from Ardea. The immediate brand recognition is an issue and especially for headhunters so they’ll have to be more proactive (not sure what the recognition in the PE space is either). I just don’t think the firm would be supportive and if we’re being real, only one offer for an undergrad FT has ever been given at Ardea and it was accepted a year ago. This first experimental hire is starting this summer. So it’s going to be very obvious if this one person is “sick” during the on-cycle madness. So this is going to be the first time any PE shop will see the name “Ardea” flashed across a resume (if they decide to recruit) - there’s no alum pipeline nada. At other places it’s helpful to see where everyone 1 year ahead of you places and ask them for help etc.

 
Most Helpful

Thanks for the expansion - so it looks like it is in relation to doing recruiting on the DL (or attempt to anyway) and needing to provide some education/communication on Ardea to recruiters. I think the second piece isn't too difficult - have a quick line in your resume that it's an IB founded by former GS partners, etc. The point on not having bank alums or people one year ahead to ask for help is good one, though I guess you could just ask your other older friends at other banks or boutiques that have made the transition.

But given OP's options, Ardea seems like a pretty good one. Same goes for DBO if it's a number of ex-MS bankers and if a lot of the junior talent have moved onto PE. Actually, if DBO has that track record, there's also a tried and true path there. But if OP also wants a good potential long-term path in banking, Ardea sounds like a good one.

FT Partners is known to be a sweatshop, but from an outsider's perspective it does look like they are quite legit in fintech if OP is considering that. I've met an ex-FT Partners person now in VC. Very thoughtful and knowledgeable.

 

I used to intern at one of BDA's Asia office. They suck. They don't do modelling in house most of the time. They use WB's fame as their marketing point, but house's capability is bs.

 

Guys I really appreciate all this insight. Seems that Ardea is an understated and lucrative option but not the best if I want to do investing later on? t feels now that decision-making is even more difficult if anything... how would i stack up to my peers in BB / EB if I end up joining a "start up bank" if I come from target with high test scores for recruiting?

 

I'd do JPM Corp Banking for a year and transfer to IB, highly doable. Might take a year longer but exit opps will be much better. Also the brand would help if you want to do MBA or move to something outside of finance. The embedded option value makes JPM the best choice in terms of risk-adjusted rewards, imho.

Also strike out BDA from your considerations. Worked there - London and NYC offices mostly do marketing works as they're Asia-focused.

 

So for PE exits, could it be something like DBO Partners / JPM Corp banking (brand name & internal transfer) > FT Partners > Ardea Partners? Looks like BDA is off the decision table based on what ppl are saying.

In terms of brand prestige, perhaps Ardea Partners and JPM Corp banking are my best options i guess.

 

Agree with this. It's not like OP has some no name backwater IB boutique option, he/she's got some pretty attractive options to choose from. You can't just assume that you'll be able to lateral into JPM IB from the Corp Banking team. That option may not be available, and you'd be going up against external candidates that are either direct laterals from other IBs / corporate finance advisory from Big 4 or boutiques.

Other than for 'stability' argument that maybe your job is safer with JPM CB in a downturn, I don't see why you'd give up good IB options vs. possibly getting into IB later, and then have to try and move to PE again. Even with the stability argument - if Ardea is as top heavy and short on analysts as it appears (someone correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not familiar with them), layoffs are less likely to happen at the analyst level because they're cheap. It'd happen at the middle layer - like VPs. Conversely, in a large bank where you have an army of analysts, anyone could be hit.

 

That's true for most corporate banking gigs, but CB at JPM trains with IB and does RCs, TLAs, TLBs, IG & HY bonds, and acquisition financing with CB leading the deal, not IB. They just don't work with sponsors; all the financing proceeds are either for corporate purposes, tuck-in acquisitions, or medium sized acquisitions.

 

Assuming you're goal is purely PE asap, my 2 cents from reading everything here is probably DBO > Ardea > FT > JPM

DBO probably places well into PE since they do so many sponsor deals & have relationships there. Ardea may not be a well-trodden path but having a billion dollar deal on your resume speaks volumes for itself, compared with possibly FT. As for JPM, the uncertainty with internal transferring and the extra years required doesn't seem to be worth it given you can go to PE directly from any of the other options above.

 

I know DBO is run by former group/division heads at Morgan Stanley and Ardea is run by former IB group/division heads at Goldman Sachs.

 

Do not take JPM Corp Banking over the boutique banks...Corp banking is very different from investment banking and you will likely have to work 2 years before moving to the IB side. Who knows what the economy is gonna be like and internal mobility won’t do you any good if M&A market is dead.

The founding goal of Ardea is to become a merchant bank one day, so kinda like Raine or maybe BDT but with more focus on advisory. They’ve been very successful in just m&a so from what I heard they only started recently to try to establish an investing arm (though you shouldn’t make your decision based on a rumor, and nobody knows if it will be able to raise money & be successful). If you look at the team page, a lot of the folks there have buyside experiences. I would say the experience you’d get at Ardea would be top notch, especially if they focus on M&A execution. You just need to be more proactive when talking to headhunters but if you have solid deal experiences, it won’t be hard to get interviews.

FT partners could be a solid choice as well. You should also think about location. You can recruit to pretty much anywhere from NYC, but it’s difficult to recruit for PE in NYC if you are on the west coast.

 

I just want to help you out but the exits you mentioned except for Accel were all through prior connections those analysts had. It's hard to prove otherwise but that is actually the case.

Will update my computer soon and leave Incognito so I will disappear forever. How did I achieve Neanderthal by trolling? Some people are after me so need to close account for safety.
 

Go away troll, you can say that about basically any exit. Finance is so small that those in PE probably already knew someone at their current firm when recruiting. Also how would you even know that lol?

 

This isn't that true at all. At that rate, networking and talking to people is a waste of time.

Will update my computer soon and leave Incognito so I will disappear forever. How did I achieve Neanderthal by trolling? Some people are after me so need to close account for safety.
 

Ardea Partners or DBO Partners, depending on your location preference, is your best choice. They were founded by veteran bankers from GS and MS respectively and have recruited top talent. My impression is that Ardea is trying to expand rapidly while DBO is more strategic about it. Either way, you're looking at two fantastic opportunities to work closely with former heads at two of the top IBs. I think you'll gain some of the best banking experiences at these two shops.

BDA Partners and FT Partners are also solid shops with strong deal flow. But it seems like you'd be limiting yourself to either cross-border or FinTech deals with these two. I began my career as a generalist and appreciated the opportunity to explore.

 

FT Partners gives out great comp and focuses on a very niche but interesting space. Firm's also growing a lot. JPM Corporate has good internal transfers to IB if you're a top performer. Don't know enough about the others to give an honest opinion on. Choose where you fit in the most and where you could see yourself growing at.

 

How great is the comp? Top bucket is 100% of base. Bottom bucket is 40-50% of base.

Will update my computer soon and leave Incognito so I will disappear forever. How did I achieve Neanderthal by trolling? Some people are after me so need to close account for safety.
 

I don’t think it would be smart to narrow yourself to just FinTech when you are beginning your career. You generally want to start broad, and then make your way into a niche. Don’t get me wrong, I think FinTech is exciting. But since you have other solid options, I’d consider those before FTP. If you want a true generalist experience, take DBO. They do everything from tech to industrials to sports to sponsors.

 

Veritatis et non aut rerum a. Optio est et provident qui illum et nihil. Expedita voluptatum doloribus totam delectus dolorum qui. Consectetur ut sed tempora eum. Occaecati ab odit tempora qui.

Accusantium veritatis quia aliquid voluptas laudantium iure ut. Sint reprehenderit quo harum quia maiores vel inventore. Qui maiores ipsam soluta. Mollitia aut autem aut velit ipsum.

 

Repellendus qui eligendi illo. Doloremque aliquam et possimus id. Voluptas et sit eum est. Velit necessitatibus corporis optio eaque voluptatem non reprehenderit.

Dolorem et et ab inventore fugiat aliquam ea iusto. Quasi est rerum a commodi. Odio culpa est nemo earum reiciendis. Voluptas aliquid unde exercitationem nihil qui dolor omnis.

Aut animi voluptatem ut omnis recusandae. Quae deleniti doloribus sint numquam veritatis corporis molestias. Quam iure distinctio inventore consequatur. Quis reiciendis aut deserunt fuga unde rerum natus.

Voluptatem cupiditate quia in voluptatem. Temporibus non odit reiciendis et beatae ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”