Why the interest coverage ratio focuses on net operating income insted of unlevered free cash flow?

A bank would prefer to know exactly how much money is available to pay interests, not just an approximation. Let's point out that after NOI there are still CapEx, Taxes, Admin Fees to pay. So why focusing on NOI instead of UFCF?

 
Best Response

The primary "below the line" (below NOI anyway) items you typically see are capex, tenant improvements, and leasing commissions. These can indeed be significant expenses. Lenders have a few ways of addressing this.

If the property is "unstabilized" (meaning there is significant work and/or vacancy to address and considerable cost in doing so) the lender will often structure a holdback or reserve. In other words, the lender will target a certain level of proceeds it is ultimately okay advancing to borrower, and will reduce that amount by whatever stabilization costs are budgeted. The lender will then advance cash from the reserve when there is proof those capital expenses have been paid, or once the property has achieved targeted operating performance. That way NOI more or less represents the cash flow that will be available from the property to cover debt service.

Alternatively, for a stabilized property, a lender might add a "capital reserve" line item in the formula used to calculate the debt service coverage ratio. So NOI as an owner thinks about it may not be the same (and is generally higher) than the NOI amount that the lender uses in its covenant test. When negotiating loan docs, it's important to pay careful attention to how these calculations work.

There are many other approaches (cash flow sweeps, springing letters of credit or springing recourse, etc), but in general NOI is used to approximate the long-run ability of the property to generate cash available for debt service, and one-time lumpy capital items are addressed separately.

 
re-ib-ny:

The primary "below the line" (below NOI anyway) items you typically see are capex, tenant improvements, and leasing commissions. These can indeed be significant expenses. Lenders have a few ways of addressing this.

If the property is "unstabilized" (meaning there is significant work and/or vacancy to address and considerable cost in doing so) the lender will often structure a holdback or reserve. In other words, the lender will target a certain level of proceeds it is ultimately okay advancing to borrower, and will reduce that amount by whatever stabilization costs are budgeted. The lender will then advance cash from the reserve when there is proof those capital expenses have been paid, or once the property has achieved targeted operating performance. That way NOI more or less represents the cash flow that will be available from the property to cover debt service.

Alternatively, for a stabilized property, a lender might add a "capital reserve" line item in the formula used to calculate the debt service coverage ratio. So NOI as an owner thinks about it may not be the same (and is generally higher) than the NOI amount that the lender uses in its covenant test. When negotiating loan docs, it's important to pay careful attention to how these calculations work.

There are many other approaches (cash flow sweeps, springing letters of credit or springing recourse, etc), but in general NOI is used to approximate the long-run ability of the property to generate cash available for debt service, and one-time lumpy capital items are addressed separately.

Good stuff. I will add that lenders may even require many separate reserve accounts simply based on asset profile. Office space that is characterized by a few, large tenants with significant role during the term may require multiple tenant specific TI reserves.

 
DBI3171:
re-ib-ny:

The primary "below the line" (below NOI anyway) items you typically see are capex, tenant improvements, and leasing commissions. These can indeed be significant expenses. Lenders have a few ways of addressing this.

If the property is "unstabilized" (meaning there is significant work and/or vacancy to address and considerable cost in doing so) the lender will often structure a holdback or reserve. In other words, the lender will target a certain level of proceeds it is ultimately okay advancing to borrower, and will reduce that amount by whatever stabilization costs are budgeted. The lender will then advance cash from the reserve when there is proof those capital expenses have been paid, or once the property has achieved targeted operating performance. That way NOI more or less represents the cash flow that will be available from the property to cover debt service.

Alternatively, for a stabilized property, a lender might add a "capital reserve" line item in the formula used to calculate the debt service coverage ratio. So NOI as an owner thinks about it may not be the same (and is generally higher) than the NOI amount that the lender uses in its covenant test. When negotiating loan docs, it's important to pay careful attention to how these calculations work.

There are many other approaches (cash flow sweeps, springing letters of credit or springing recourse, etc), but in general NOI is used to approximate the long-run ability of the property to generate cash available for debt service, and one-time lumpy capital items are addressed separately.

Good stuff. I will add that lenders may even require many separate reserve accounts simply based on asset profile. Office space that is characterized by a few, large tenants with significant role during the term may require multiple tenant specific TI reserves.

Agreed. Lenders will also distinguish between NOI DSCR and other expenses.

 

All of those things you listed are considered when making a mortgage. DSCR is just one metric and obviously not used alone. RE taxes, replacement reserve (ongoing cap ex) and management fees ("admin expense") are all included in underwritten NOI anyways. If there are big cap ex projects on the horizon the PCA will note them and the lender may require a reserve from loan proceeds be set aside for it.

 

Also, outside of the RE context many of those below the line items are somewhat discretionary. Yes I understand taxes is a big one that isn't really and there are certainly others but for ease of use and comparability the NOI is used. In the instance of say something like capex, a company is not likely going to default in order to build sink some money into a capital project.

 

Voluptatem et omnis itaque et laboriosam ratione provident minima. Est suscipit voluptatem delectus autem eligendi dolor non. Veniam recusandae et enim non commodi consequatur. Autem aut numquam earum possimus voluptas. Maiores laborum ullam consequatur ut. Temporibus quo vitae debitis illum excepturi. Blanditiis magni nam aut ipsam error ut.

Facere nisi nihil molestiae nihil delectus. Explicabo laboriosam et saepe non. Similique fugit laboriosam omnis consequuntur sunt dicta dicta.

Nostrum recusandae qui non ut et ut facere. Optio et aut occaecati nobis odio. Molestias dicta repellat repellat. Quis qui vel perferendis placeat deleniti quia voluptatibus.

Deserunt veniam pariatur repellat non hic. Totam sed veritatis sapiente qui aliquid rerum sed commodi. Quisquam delectus velit natus eum earum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”